Simo Holdings, Inc. v. H.K. uCloudlink Network Tech. Ltd.

BVLaw
Full Text of Court Cases
August 28, 2019

Access the Full Article

This article and its downloads are available with a subscription to any of these products:
It is also available in these products:
Already a subscriber or product owner?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (13,581 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
7379 Computer Related Services, NEC
541519 Other Computer Related Services
intellectual property
damages, lost profits, royalty rate, expert testimony, reasonable royalty, royalty base, apportionment
Simo Holdings, Inc. v. H.K. uCloudlink Network Tech. Ltd.
2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 146702
US
Federal Court
New York
United States District Court
Christopher Martinez (plaintiff); John Hansen (defendants)
Rakoff

Summary

Court denies defendants’ post-trial challenge to jury award; court finds award was based on a theory of reasonable royalty, not lost profits, as defendants claim; plaintiff expert’s royalty rate properly captured value added by plaintiff’s patent and relationship between plaintiff and defendants.
Simo Holdings Inc. v. H.K. uCloudlink Network Tech. Ltd
PDF, Size: 630 KB

See Also

Expert’s Reasonable Royalty Properly Captured Value Added by Plaintiff’s Invention

Court Case Digests
August 28, 2019

Court denies defendants’ post-trial challenge to jury award; court finds award was based on a theory of reasonable royalty, not lost profits, as defendants claim; plaintiff expert’s royalty rate properly captured value added by plaintiff’s patent and relationship between plaintiff and defendants.

This article also appears in:
Intellectual Property Valuation Case Law Compendium, Fourth Edition
The Comprehensive Guide to Economic Damages, Seventh Edition