Mary Ann Linsell v. Applied Handling, Inc.

BVLaw
Full Text of Court Cases
February 8, 2005
3999 Manufacturing Industries, NEC
336111 Automobile Manufacturing
contract
damages, expert testimony, discovery, financial expert testimony, future earnings

Mary Ann Linsell v. Applied Handling, Inc.
No. 249647 (Mich. App. 2005), unpublished
US
State Court
Michigan
Court of Appeals
Anthony Antoun

Summary

The Michigan Court of Appeals determined that a financial expert should not be excluded as a discovery sanction when the failure to provide supplemental responses to interrogatories from an expert are occasioned by a delay in providing necessary information.
Mary Ann Linsell v. Applied Handling, Inc.
PDF, Size: 136 KB

See Also

Exclusion of Expert Testimony as a Discovery Sanction Considered

The Michigan Court of Appeals determined that a financial expert should not be excluded as a discovery sanction when the failure to provide supplemental responses to interrogatories from an expert are occasioned by a delay in providing necessary information.