Lund v. Lund (I)

BVLaw
Full Text of Court Cases
June 2, 2017

Access the Full Article

This article and its downloads are available with a subscription to any of these products:
Already a subscriber?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (16,666 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
5411 Grocery Stores
445110 Supermarkets and Other Grocery Retailers (except Convenience Retailers)
judicial dissolution
discount rate, expert testimony, fair value, net asset value, buyout, discount for lack of marketability (DLOM), discounted cash flow (DCF), fair market value (FMV), minority discount, minority interest, real estate, debt, holding company, discount for lack of control (DLOC), capital intensive, equity value, cash flow projections
Lund v. Lund (I)
27-CV-14-20058 (J. Bernhardson) (District Court, Fourth Judicial District, Hennepin County, Minnesota)
US
State Court
Minnesota
District Court
Robert Reilly (plaintiff/seller); Roger Grabowski (defendants/buyers)
Bernhardson

Summary

In a forced buyout, court says experts were too partisan to their clients, compromising value analysis; court performs its own valuation using DCF to determine fair value of grocery business and rejects DLOM because no unfair transfer of wealth occurs.
Lund v. Lund
PDF, Size: 328 KB

See Also

In Big Buyout Ruling, Minnesota Court Rejects DLOM in Calculating Fair Value

Court Case Digests
June 2, 2017

In a forced buyout, court says experts were too partisan to their clients, compromising value analysis; court performs its own valuation using DCF to determine fair value of grocery business and rejects DLOM because no unfair transfer of wealth occurs.