Lucent Technologies, Inc. v. Microsoft Corp. (IV)

BVLaw
Full Text of Court Cases
November 10, 2011

Access the Full Article

This article and its downloads are available with a subscription to any of these products:
It is also available in these products:
Already a subscriber or product owner?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (9,906 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
7372 Prepackaged Software
511210 Software Publishers
intellectual property
economic damages & lost profits
Lucent Technologies, Inc. v. Microsoft Corp. (IV)
2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 130571
US
Federal Court
California
United States District Court
Raymond Sims
Huff

Summary

Federal district court reverses $70 million award based on expert’s failure to apportion damages between the patented and unpatented features of the accused product, finding that, at most, the evidence supported $26 million based on proper apportionment ...
Lucent Technologies, Inc. v. Microsoft Corp. (IV)
PDF, Size: 215 KB

See Also

Apportionment Is Key to Calculating Patent Damages

Legal and Court Case Update
February 2012

Federal district court reverses $70 million award based on expert’s failure to apportion damages between the patented and unpatented features of the accused product, finding that, at most, the evidence supported $26 million based on proper apportionment ...

This article also appears in:
Intellectual Property Valuation Case Law Compendium, Fourth Edition
The Comprehensive Guide to Economic Damages, Seventh Edition
Intellectual Property Valuation Case Law Compendium, Second Edition