Irene Dinyer-Frazer v. Laurentian Bank, et al.

BVLaw
Full Text of Court Cases
February 18, 2005

Access the Full Article

This article and its downloads are available with a subscription to any of these products:
Already a subscriber?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (34,746 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
Irene Dinyer-Frazer v. Laurentian Bank, et al.
2005 BCSC 225
Canada

Summary

In Irene Dinyer-Frazer v. Laurentian Bank, et al., 2005 BCSC 225 (February 18, 2005), the Supreme Court of British Columbia considered the amount of past and future wages lost as a result of defamation. Dinyer-Fraser was an investment advisor. In 1992, sh ...
Irene Dinyer-Frazer v. Laurentian Bank, et al.
PDF, Size: 368 KB

See Also

Securities Dealer’s Lost Income Resulting from a Defamatory Letter Computed

Legal and Court Case Update
February 18, 2005

In Irene Dinyer-Frazer v. Laurentian Bank, et al., 2005 BCSC 225 (February 18, 2005), the Supreme Court of British Columbia considered the amount of past and future wages lost as a result of defamation. Dinyer-Fraser was an investment advisor. In 1992, sh ...