Fresenius USA, Inc. v. Baxter International, Inc. (II)

BVLaw
Full Text of Court Cases
March 8, 2012

Access the Full Article

This article and its downloads are available with a subscription to any of these products:
It is also available in this product:
Already a subscriber or product owner?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (8,954 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
3841 Surgical and Medical Instruments and Apparatus
339112 Surgical and Medical Instrument Manufacturing
intellectual property
Fresenius USA, Inc. v. Baxter International, Inc. (II)
2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 30949
US
Federal Court
California
United States District Court
Daniel Rubenfeld (plaintiff) and Bruce Den Uyl (defendant)
Hamilton

Summary

Court applies modified Georgia-Pacific analysis—including changed economic circumstances between the parties as well as changes in patent law—to determine post-verdict, ongoing reasonable royalty rate.
Fresenius USA, Inc. v. Baxter International, Inc. (II)
PDF, Size: 71 KB

See Also

‘Modified’ Georgia-Pacific Analysis Applies to Post-Verdict Royalties

Legal and Court Case Update
July 2012

Court applies modified Georgia-Pacific analysis—including changed economic circumstances between the parties as well as changes in patent law—to determine post-verdict, ongoing reasonable royalty rate.

This article also appears in:
Intellectual Property Valuation Case Law Compendium, Fourth Edition