Summary
The U.S. Tax Court valued four holding and one operating companies. It rejected the estate's expert because he valued the holding companies using weighted combination of earnings and asset approaches. It additionally rejected his use of book value of pro ...
Estate of Ray A. Ford v. CIR
PDF, Size: 93 KB
See Also
Holding Company’s Valued Using Net Asset Value
The U.S. Tax Court valued four holding companies and one operating company.
Estate of Ford v. Commissioner
The United States Tax Court examined the valuation of five, family-owned, closely held companies.