Estate of Forbes v. Commissioner

BVLaw
Full Text of Court Cases
March 23, 2001

Access the Full Article

This article and its downloads are available with a subscription to any of these products:
Already a subscriber?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (7,214 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
0191 General Farms, Primarily Crop
111998 All Other Miscellaneous Crop Farming
estate and gift taxation
estate tax, fair market value (FMV), sole proprietorship, limited partnership, marketability
Estate of Forbes v. Commissioner
T.C. Memo 2001-72, 2001 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 94
US
Federal Court
United States Tax Court
James F. Lawton (for estate)<br>Glen A. Hultquist (for estate)<br>Richard Parks (for IRS)
Thornton

Summary

Issue is fair market value of 42% and 42.9% undivided interests in two real estate parcels held by the QTIP, and what fractional discount should apply.
Estate of Forbes v. Commissioner
PDF, Size: 56 KB

See Also

Tax Court Upholds Estate's Fractional Discount for Minority Interest Held by Limited Partnership

Legal and Court Case Update
June 2001

This valuation dispute arose from the undivided real estate interest held by the Forbes QTIP trust.