Am. Aerial Servs. v. Terex United States

BVLaw
Full Text of Court Cases
April 29, 2015

Access the Full Article

This article and its downloads are available with a subscription to any of these products:
It is also available in this product:
Already a subscriber or product owner?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (4,488 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
3531 Construction Machinery and Equipment
333120 Construction Machinery Manufacturing
economic damages & lost profits
lost profits, breach of contract, expert testimony, admissibility, causation, rule 702, reliability, federal rules of evidence (FRE), lost revenue
Am. Aerial Servs. v. Terex United States
2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 55997
US
Federal Court
Maine
United States District Court
Reginald Perry (plaintiff); unknown (defendants)
Levy

Summary

Court strikes parts of lost profits opinion, finding expert adopted plaintiff’s causation theory, “pinning the company’s overall financial performance” on defendants’ allegedly defective crane without offering supporting data or methodology to test theory ...
American Aerial Services v. Terex United States
PDF, Size: 155 KB

See Also

Failure to Test Causation Narrative Clouds Analysis of Lost Profits

Legal and Court Case Update
July 2015

Court strikes parts of lost profits opinion, finding expert adopted plaintiff’s causation theory, “pinning the company’s overall financial performance” on defendants’ allegedly defective crane without offering supporting data or methodology to test theory ...

This article also appears in:
The Comprehensive Guide to Economic Damages, Seventh Edition