Plaintiff Awarded Direct Damages But Not Speculative ‘Growth Damages’

BVLaw
Court Case Digests
October 13, 2023

Access the Full Article

This article is available with a subscription to any of these products:
Already a subscriber?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (786 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
5023 Home Furnishings
423220 Home Furnishing Merchant Wholesalers
economic damages & lost profits
damages, breach of contract, cash flow, purchase price
Taylor Precision Prods. v. Larimer Grp., Inc.
2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 184565; 2023 WL 6785802
US
Federal Court
New York
United States District Court
Justin McClean
Andrew L. Carter, Jr.

Summary

In the damages portion of this complex suit, the court determined damages based on the plaintiff’s expert’s determination and report of same. It awarded damages on the first component of his damages calculation, the damages based on an adjusted “lost” EBITDA, but not on the second component, which the court deemed to be speculative.

See Also

Taylor Precision Prods. v. Larimer Grp., Inc.

Full Text of Court Cases
October 13, 2023

In the damages portion of this complex suit, the court determined damages based on the plaintiff’s expert’s determination and report of same. It awarded damages on the first component of his damages calculation, the damages based on an adjusted “lost” EBITDA, but not on the second component, which the court deemed to be speculative.