Summary
The wife appealed the valuation of the husband’s business, asserting that the trial court should have instructed the parties to submit evidence supporting the value instead of determining the value itself based on the evidence actually before the court. The trial court was affirmed.
See Also
West v. West
The wife appealed the valuation of the husband’s business, asserting that the trial court should have instructed the parties to submit evidence supporting the value instead of determining the value itself based on the evidence actually before the court. The trial court was affirmed.