Maryland Court Affirms the Value of Husband’s Minority Interest in an Ambulatory Surgery Center

BVLaw
Court Case Digests
October 5, 2022

Access the Full Article

This article is available with a subscription to any of these products:
Already a subscriber?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (549 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
8011 Offices and Clinics of Doctors of Medicine
621493 Freestanding Ambulatory Surgical and Emergency Centers
marital dissolution/divorce
expert testimony, marital asset, minority interest, alimony, trial court
Goicochea v. Goicochea
2022 Md. App. LEXIS 729; 2022 WL 5113852
US
State Court
Maryland
Court of Special Appeals
Joseph Estabrook; Mr. White (full name not given)
Graeff, Shaw, Moylan, Charles E., Jr.

Summary

This case was an appeal from a trial court’s various decisions relating to a divorce matter. Among other issues appealed, the appellate court affirmed the trial court’s determination of the value of the husband’s small minority interest (0.829301%) in an ambulatory surgery center. The wife’s expert used a prior transaction of a 1.1125% in the center to determine the husband’s value.

See Also

Goicochea v. Goicochea

Full Text of Court Cases
October 5, 2022

This case was an appeal from a trial court’s various decisions relating to a divorce matter. Among other issues appealed, the appellate court affirmed the trial court’s determination of the value of the husband’s small minority interest (0.829301%) in an ambulatory surgery center. The wife’s expert used a prior transaction of a 1.1125% in the center to determine the husband’s value.