Indiana Appellate Court Remands to Revalue Wife’s Business Supported by the Evidence

BVLaw
Court Case Digests
April 4, 2024

Access the Full Article

This article is available with a subscription to any of these products:
Already a subscriber?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (461 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
5137 Women's, Children's, and Infants' Clothing and Accessories, 5947 Gift, Novelty, and Souvenir Shops
458110 Clothing and Clothing Accessories Retailers, 459420 Gift, Novelty, and Souvenir Retailers
marital dissolution/divorce
child support, evidence, marital estate, earnings, dissolution, trial court
Bergquist v. Bergquist
2024 Ind. App. Unpub. LEXIS 434
US
State Court
Indiana
Court of Appeals
Mathias, Tavitas, Weissmann

Summary

The appellate court (Indiana) found that the circuit court abused its discretion when valuing the wife’s business by not determining a value based on there being no evidence that would support such a value. The appellate court remanded the issue of the value of the business for determination based on evidence that would support it.

See Also

Bergquist v. Bergquist

Full Text of Court Cases
April 4, 2024

The appellate court (Indiana) found that the circuit court abused its discretion when valuing the wife’s business by not determining a value based on there being no evidence that would support such a value. The appellate court remanded the issue of the value of the business for determination based on evidence that would support it.