Bankruptcy Court (South Carolina) Grants in Part and Denies in Part Motions to Exclude Experts in Daubert Motions

BVLaw
Court Case Digests
August 18, 2023
4731 Arrangement of Transportation of Freight and Cargo
541614 Process, Physical Distribution, and Logistics Consulting Services
bankruptcy, daubert
expert witness, business valuation, expert testimony, admissibility, deposition, disclosure, discount, fair market value (FMV), minority interest, valuation methodology, expert report, ownership interest, redemption, chapter 7 bankruptcy, qualifications, motion in limine

Vieira v. Think Tank Logistics, LLC (In re Levesque)
2023 Bankr. LEXIS 2113; 653 B.R. 127
US
Federal Court
South Carolina
United States Bankruptcy Court
John R. Markel, CPA; Christopher Nowell, CPA
Elisabetta G.M. Gasparini

Summary

In this adversary Chapter 7 proceeding, the trustee sought to avoid the debtor’s transfer of his interest in two corporate entities and either recover the interests or the value of such interests from the defendants. As part of this proceeding, the court was asked to decide on two motions in limine regarding an valuation expert from each side. The motions (Daubert) asked that the experts not be allowed to testify. The court granted in part and denied in part the motions of the parties.

See Also

Vieira v. Think Tank Logistics, LLC (In re Levesque)

In this adversary Chapter 7 proceeding, the trustee sought to avoid the debtor’s transfer of his interest in two corporate entities and either recover the interests or the value of such interests from the defendants. As part of this proceeding, the court was asked to decide on two motions in limine regarding an valuation expert from each side. The motions (Daubert) asked that the experts not be allowed to testify. The court granted in part and denied in part the motions of the parties.

This article also appears in:
Business Valuation UpdateVol. 29 No. 11