Appellate Court (California) Affirms Denial of Wife’s Motion Claiming Missing Assets and Undervalued Assets

BVLaw
Court Case Digests
January 12, 2024
5932 Used Merchandise Stores
453310 Used Merchandise Stores
marital dissolution/divorce
marital asset, community property, dissolution, gift, promissory note, assets, settlement, trial court

In re Hembree
2024 Cal. App. Unpub. LEXIS 196; 2024 WL 135942
US
State Court
California
Court of Appeal
Brian Brinig
Buchanan; O’Rourke; Irion

Summary

In this appeal of a denied motion by the wife to set aside a marital settlement order, the appellate court affirmed the trial court. The wife claimed that the husband did not disclose a number of marital assets and misrepresented the values of certain marital assets. The trial court appointed its own expert for valuation of assets. The expert was unable to value a number of the assets for lack of information including a lack of proof of existence of some alleged assets.

See Also

In re Hembree

In this appeal of a denied motion by the wife to set aside a marital settlement order, the appellate court affirmed the trial court. The wife claimed that the husband did not disclose a number of marital assets and misrepresented the values of certain marital assets. The trial court appointed its own expert for valuation of assets. The expert was unable to value a number of the assets for lack of information including a lack of proof of existence of some alleged assets.