The temptation for many business appraisals in this highly technical and analytical field is to “present a number that is less accurate but looks more accurate,” says David Wanetick (IncreMental Advantage). For example, he just recently valued a client’s patent portfolio at $5.0 million, a number that might not “look right,” he says. “The concern is, when people see the cover of the report, they will reflexively believe that this is a generic number.” As a result, the temptation is to present a number that perpetuates “the illusion” of greater accuracy, such as $4.85 million or $5.125 million. Had he done so in this case, Wanetick says, he would have been wrong. “According to my analysis, the value was $5.0 million and the number I published was $5.0 million.”
Similarly, when developing a decision tree, he will find that some of the various scenarios equate to a flat 50% risk, which might look like an uneducated “guess” compared to 45% or 52.5%. Repetition of a number within an analysis presents another temptation; if a reasonable royalty rate is 6% but so is the premium to the discount rate, then it might appear more accurate to change one of the numbers. However, if 50% or 6% or any other number “best reflects the analysis and can be supported,” Wanetick says, then that is the number the analyst should use.
Please let us know
if you have any comments about this article or enhancements you would like to see.