The Absence of a Size Effect Relevant to the Cost of Equity

BVResearch Pro
American Society of Appraisers Business Valuation Review™
Fall 2018 Volume 37, Issue 3 pp. 87-92
Clifford S. Ang
cost of capital
cost of equity, capital asset pricing model (CAPM), size effect


In this paper, I evaluate whether there is a size effect that is relevant to the cost of equity. I first analyze what model investors use to determine the required rate of return on their investment and find investors prefer the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) over other models, even those that include a size proxy. I also show that over the period 1981 to 2016, small stocks underperformed large stocks, which is inconsistent with the existence of a size effect. Finally, I conclude that size effect studies have not been able to surmount the criticisms that the size effect lacks a theoretical basis and that the results of size effect studies are susceptible to data mining criticisms. Given these results, practitioners should reconsider the standard practice of augmenting their cost of equity with a size premium.
The Absence of a Size Effect Relevant to the Cost of Equity
PDF, Size: 115 KB

Copyright American Society of Appraisers

The information contained in this product is based on content obtained by ASA from sources considered to be reliable, but is not guaranteed as to accuracy and does not purport to be complete. BVR and ASA accept no liability for the use of such information which is provided "AS IS" and with no warranties, express or implied.