Combined Expert Testimony May Provide Valid Damages Framework
In Daubert case, court finds government’s combined expert testimony concerning financial impact of negative publicity on sponsor (USPS) of Lance Armstrong and his cycling team provides “sufficiently non-speculative framework for determining damages.”
United States ex rel. Landis v. Tailwind Sports Corp.
In Daubert case, court finds government’s combined expert testimony concerning financial impact of negative publicity on sponsor (USPS) of Lance Armstrong and his cycling team provides “sufficiently non-speculative framework for determining damages.”
Guang Dong v. ACI International, Inc.
In the absence of actual data, expert relies on emails and depositions to arrive at lost profits value.
Century 21 Real Estate Corp. v. Meraj International Investment Corp.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit affirmed an award of lost profits in this breach of contract case.
Owner’s Seemingly Speculative Lost Profits Estimate Is Better Than No Testimony
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit affirmed an award of lost profits in this breach of contract case.