Expand the following panels for additional search options.

Sloan Valve Company v. Zurn Industries, Inc.

Court excludes royalty analysis veering from “classic way” in that expert used number of infringing products, not revenue, as royalty base and dollar amount, not percentage of the revenue, as royalty rate.

Inexact Apportionment Invalidates Expert’s Royalty Calculation

Court excludes plaintiff expert testimony under Daubert, finding both the expert’s royalty base and rate determinations fatally flawed due to the expert’s inexact apportionment; in valuing damages, he failed to compensate only for the infringement caused ...

Rembrandt Social Media, LP v. Facebook

Court excludes plaintiff expert testimony under Daubert, finding both the expert’s royalty base and rate determinations fatally flawed due to the expert’s inexact apportionment; in valuing damages, he failed to compensate only for the infringement caused ...

News, Views and Muse

Royalty rates in pharma deals

Royalty rates in pharma deals

What is a reasonable RAND royalty rate and range?

76 - 100 of 175 results