Patent Damages Expert Crashes and Burns in Jet Engine Dispute
Federal court strikes substantial portions of lost profits, reasonably royalty evidence for “egregious overreaching” by patent infringement plaintiff and damages expert.
Rolls-Royce PLC v. United Technologies Corp.
Federal court strikes substantial portions of lost profits, reasonably royalty evidence for “egregious overreaching” by patent infringement plaintiff and damages expert.
Mirror Worlds, LLC v. Apple, Inc.
Federal district court tosses out a $208 million jury award for lack of sufficient evidence proving patent infringement and for lack of legally justified damages, including improper reliance on entire market value of accused products.
Enpat, Inc. v. Budnic
Federal court denies plaintiff’s request to prorate past patent infringement damages from actual prior licenses without additional evidence that the parties’ would have used a similar proration during hypothetical negotiations.
Dana Corp. v. Microtherm, Inc.
Court finds evidence of indivisible lost profits damages insufficient when law specifically requires a separate breakdown of damages caused by each defendant in breach of contract case.
‘Flawed’ Reasonable Royalty Analysis Forces Court to Average the Experts
Court finds flaws with reasonable royalty rate calculations.
Rosco Inc. v. Mirror Lite Company
Court finds flaws with reasonable royalty rate calculations ...