In unusual business tort case, court exhibits flexibility in terms of calculating damages
The 8th Circuit recently upheld a sizable damages award in an unusual business tort case litigated under Nebraska law. One noteworthy aspect in terms of determining economic damages was that the court allowed expert testimony regarding the loss of value to the plaintiff even though the plaintiff did not fail completely upon the wrongdoing.
Absence of Noncompete Drives Goodwill Valuation in Liquidation Sale
In case of voluntary corporate dissolution under judicial supervision, appeals court finds receiver’s minimum bid value was based on correct standard of value (liquidation value) and calculated auction sales price reflected all elements of a going concern ...
Absence of Noncompete Drives Goodwill Valuation in Liquidation Sale
In case of voluntary corporate dissolution under judicial supervision, appeals court finds receiver’s minimum bid value was based on correct standard of value (liquidation value) and calculated auction sales price reflected all elements of a going concern ...
Perry v. Sackett
In case of voluntary corporate dissolution under judicial supervision, appeals court finds receiver’s minimum bid value was based on correct standard of value (liquidation value) and calculated auction sales price reflected all elements of a going concern ...
Breach of Noncompete Means Damages for ‘Loss Sustained’ and Lost Profits
In breach of noncompete case, appeals court finds measure of damages is not limited to net loss; statute allows damages “for the loss sustained” in addition to lost profits, and trial court properly credited and adjusted expert’s typical damages models.
Mann v. Mann
In appreciation of value case, court agrees with wife’s expert that calculation of marital portion of wife’s interest in family business requires quantification of personal goodwill attributable to wife based on value of noncompete to potential buyer in arm’s-length transaction.
Court Adopts Appreciation Analysis That Places ‘Specific Dollar Value’ on Goodwill
In appreciation of value case, court agrees with wife’s expert that calculation of marital portion of wife’s interest in family business requires quantification of personal goodwill attributable to wife based on value of noncompete to potential buyer in arm’s-length transaction.
Buyer’s Failure to Assign Value to Practice Goodwill Nullifies Noncompete
Appeals court says noncompete/nonsolicitation clauses accompanying sale of solo practitioner’s medical practice to large healthcare provider are unenforceable where buyer allocated zero dollar value to practice’s goodwill; court strikes down injunction.
Ohio Appeals Court Clarifies Provision on Tax Affecting at Divorce
Appeals court says consideration of tax consequences related to owner-spouse’s business is “too speculative” because owner has no plan to sell in near future; trial court improperly assumed current tax rates and business interests would remain constant.
Pattridge v. Starks
In breach of noncompete case, appeals court finds measure of damages is not limited to net loss; statute allows damages “for the loss sustained” in addition to lost profits, and trial court properly credited and adjusted expert’s typical damages models.
Healthcare v. Orr
Appeals court says noncompete/nonsolicitation clauses accompanying sale of solo practitioner’s medical practice to large healthcare provider are unenforceable where buyer allocated zero dollar value to practice’s goodwill; court strikes down injunction.
Nieman v. Nieman
Appeals court says consideration of tax consequences related to owner-spouse’s business is “too speculative” because owner has no plan to sell in near future; trial court improperly assumed current tax rates and business interests would remain constant.
Multimillion-Dollar Personal Goodwill Allocation Leaves Court Stunned
Court says defendants were unjustly enriched when they allocated 40% of the price a competitor paid for assets of and to settle lawsuit with their company to personal goodwill where they also received compensation for consulting services and noncompetes.
Devoid of Goodwill, Corporation Escapes Income Tax Liability
Tax Court says taxpayer’s company owned no corporate goodwill and had no right to taxpayer’s personal goodwill and, therefore, was not liable under IRC Sect. 311(b)(1); the taxpayer, in turn, was not liable for gifting corporate goodwill to his sons.
Usurped Opportunity Case Justifies Use of Defendant’s Profits
Appeals court validates expert’s use of defendant’s net profits as measure of damages in usurped business opportunity case; hypothesizing a facility that the plaintiff could have had and the profits it might made in competition “would not make sense.”
Potok v. Rebh
Court says defendants were unjustly enriched when they allocated 40% of the price a competitor paid for assets of and to settle lawsuit with their company to personal goodwill where they also received compensation for consulting services and noncompetes.
St. Alphonsus Diversified Care, Inc. v. MRI Associates, LLP
Appeals court validates expert’s use of defendant’s net profits as measure of damages in usurped business opportunity case; hypothesizing a facility that the plaintiff could have had and the profits it might made in competition “would not make sense.”
For DLOM, Court Looks to Signs of Sale of Practice
Court affirms income-based valuation of husband’s dental clinic, including deduction for non-compete attributable to associate, but finds lack of signs that husband intended to sell practice precludes use of DLOM.
Bross Trucking, Inc. v. Commissioner
Tax Court says taxpayer’s company owned no corporate goodwill and had no right to taxpayer’s personal goodwill and, therefore, was not liable under IRC Sect. 311(b)(1); the taxpayer, in turn, was not liable for gifting corporate goodwill to his sons.
Barnes v. Barnes
Court affirms income-based valuation of husband’s dental clinic, including deduction for non-compete attributable to associate, but finds lack of signs that husband intended to sell practice precludes use of DLOM.
Schmidt v. Schmidt
Appeals court overturns valuation, finding trial court mistakenly accepted valuation that assumed and required noncompete from owner spouse without expert’s calculating value assuming no noncompete; valuation still includes personal goodwill component that must be excised, appeals court says.
American Logistics Group, Inc. v. Joseph Weinpert
The Ohio Court of Appeals, 8th District, affirmed an award of lost profits in this breach of non-compete agreement action.
All Pro Maids, Inc. v. Susan Layton
The Delaware Court of Chancery determined damages stemming from the breach of a one-year noncompete agreement involving an office cleaning business.