Expand the following panels for additional search options.

Lack of appraisal evidence results in ballpark valuation by court

One issue in this marital dissolution was the value of husband’s gun business, the Cop Shop.

Failure to consider shareholder loan has no impact on property division

Issues in this marital dissolution were the value of husband’s electrical contracting business, Romey Electric, and the proper treatment of a shareholder loan husband made to the wholly owned S corporation.

Capitalized cash flow value accepted over speculative 'adjusted' value

Husband opened a wholesale jewelry business during the marriage.

Personal Goodwill Not Included in Marital Value of Commercial Plumbing Business

In this marital dissolution, one issue was the value of husband’s commercial plumbing business, T.J. Mechanical, Inc.

In re the Marriage of Bartsch

Fair market asset value upheld as appropriate valuation technique for a farming corporation.

Minnesota law dictates eight factors to consider in determining value

Husband challenged the trial court’s valuation of his business, attacking the wife’s expert’s methodology.

Tennessee follows mainstream: no foreseeable sale, no tax consequences

The couple was married in 1976, and wife filed for divorce in 2001. Husband and wife were both pharmacists, although wife had not worked for many years. Husband owned a pharmacy called Village Drugs.

Court rejects discounts for lack of supporting evidence

One of the issues in this marital dissolution was the value of the parties’ interests in a real estate development partnership and S corporation.

Trial court’s failure to make specific findings of fact results in reversal

One of the issues in this marital dissolution was the value of husband’s 50% interest in his surgical practice, Catawba Surgical Associates PA.

Goodwill valuation based on case law factors and methods upheld

One of the issues in this case was the value of the goodwill of WPC.

Intrinsic Value Appropriate in Marital Dissolution so No Discounts Applied

The issues in this case were whether, in valuing husband’s business interest, the trial court abused its discretion by failing to apply (1) a discount for lack of control (2) a discount for capital gains tax consequences (3) salary adjustments.

Appeals Court Refuses to Disturb Lower Court’s Findings on Expert Credibility

Husband owned a Ford Motor Company SSIP (Savings and Stock Investment Plan) account. The account consisted of four components: (1) Ford Company Stock; (2) Ford Common Stock; (3) Current Inte ...

Adametz v. Adametz

Trial court erred in allowing the deduction of future overhead expenses against husband's share of the accounts receivable at the hospital of which we was part owner.

Schuneman v. Bellrose

Business was abandoned and lost its value by trial date, but since no alternative valuation date was requested, the court used the original value.

Steneken v. Steneken (I)

The issue in this marital dissolution was the perceived “double counting” of the husband’s excess earnings from his closely held corporation, Esco.

In re the Marriage of Withers

Court errs in giving wife's business no value when it had physical assets and two checking accounts with balances. Business revalued at the sum of assets and checking account balances.

Valuation finding that merely lists two factors found erroneous

One of the issues in this marital dissolution was the valuation of the parties’ closely held postal and shipping service business, Alley Enterprises, Inc. which operated The Mailbox Plus.

Expert credibility bolstered by management interviews and site visits

The parties were married in 1971 and separated in 1996. Wife owned stock in W.H. Conyngham & Co., Inc., a family-owned business, which was gifted to her by her father and grandmother.

Rubino v. Rubino

Attorney husband argues that accounts receivable and work in progress should not be valued as per partnership agreement, but judgment is affirmed.

Sanders v. Sanders

Husband's expert's valuation upheld because of competent method (excess earnings & sales price to cash flow), detailed testimony and experience.

Ferro v. Ferro

Husband's gun dealership valued by court, wife's valuation of business without merit. No experts were consulted.

Valuation date, equitable increase in value award affirmed

Husband’s failure to provide financial information about the business beyond the valuation date used by wife’s expert precluded him from challenging the valuation date.

Practice goodwill calculated using excess earnings method upheld; distinguished from personal goodwill

The issues in this marital dissolution were whether the trial court erred in its valuation of husband’s veterinary clinic, Millard Veterinary Clinic (MVC ...

Court adopts income approach valuation but deducts personal goodwill

One of the issues in this marital dissolution was whether the trial court erred in accepting the valuations of husband’s medical practice ...

Company’s uniqueness and limited marketability equal zero goodwill

The parties were married in 1990, separated in 1997, and divorced in 1998.

126 - 150 of 912 results