Browne v. Browne, Jr.
Appeals court defers to trial court’s method of applying one expert’s cap rate to other expert’s cash flow analysis when valuing spouse’s interest in closely held company and says “purposeful” application of minority discount has support among valuators.
Valuation Confirms Salability of ‘Unique’ Restaurant’s Goodwill
State high court rejects per se extension of personal goodwill concept to nonprofessional businesses and finds in case at issue restaurant’s valuation indicates goodwill is marketable and thus corporate and subject to marital distribution.
Court Proscribes Litigant’s Efforts to Foil Expert’s Valuation
Court admits expert’s testimony despite his failure to appear for scheduled deposition where husband’s refusal to provide necessary corporate information delayed expert’s completion of the business valuation and says any error in the opinion was “invited”
Appeals Court Tiptoes Around Tax Affecting in Divorce Setting
Appeals court agrees that in valuing husband’s S corp for marital distribution “national case law” (Kessler, Bernier) supports his expert’s tax affecting but says it must defer to trial court’s decision to adopt competing expert’s position not to tax affe ...
Brave v. Brave (II)
State high court rejects per se extension of personal goodwill concept to nonprofessional businesses and finds in case at issue restaurant’s valuation indicates goodwill is marketable and thus corporate and subject to marital distribution.
Can a Restaurant Have Personal Goodwill?
State appellate court finds “professional license goodwill” exception, which treats personal goodwill as professional spouse’s separate property, applies to “unique,” successful restaurant and directs trial court to determine how much of the business’s go ...
Hard Asset Value Best Captures Worth of Family Business
In divorce case, appellate court upholds classification of a family business as hybrid property, entitling the community to the increase in value that came about during the marriage; and, it validates the trial court’s decision to rest its valuation on th ...
Hamelink v. Hamelink
Appeals court agrees that in valuing husband’s S corp for marital distribution “national case law” (Kessler, Bernier) supports his expert’s tax affecting but says it must defer to trial court’s decision to adopt competing expert’s position not to tax affe ...
Low Risk to Business Justifies Expert’s Capitalization Rate
In divorce case, appellate court upholds valuation of a small agriculture-related company based on the capitalization of net income approach; record supports court-appointed expert’s capitalization rate, including his selection of the supply-side equity r ...
Excess Earnings Method Best Suited to Value New York City Practice
In divorce case, New York trial court prefers excess earnings over price-to-revenue method to value wife’s dental practice, because the former accounts for the business’s lack of tangible assets—a fact specific to professional offices in New York where re ...
Brave v. Brave (I)
State appellate court finds “professional license goodwill” exception, which treats personal goodwill as professional spouse’s separate property, applies to “unique,” successful restaurant and directs trial court to determine how much of the business’s go ...
Unequal Distribution of Family Business Stock Requires Discounts
Trial court abused its discretion when it assigned to wife stock in closely held company that made her a minority shareholder and when it failed to value the asset at issue; because the in-kind distribution left her with illiquid assets and no control ove ...
Alexander v. Alexander
In divorce case, appellate court upholds valuation of a small agriculture-related company based on the capitalization of net income approach; record supports court-appointed expert’s capitalization rate, including his selection of the supply-side equity r ...
Starling v. Starling
In divorce case, appellate court upholds classification of a family business as hybrid property, entitling the community to the increase in value that came about during the marriage; and, it validates the trial court’s decision to rest its valuation on th ...
Negotiated Formula for Stock Option Price Obviates DLOM Need
Eleventh Circuit upholds Tax Court’s $36.9 million valuation of executive stock option, finding that by using the parties’ negotiated formula for the number of shares equaling $16 million at the date of exercise and declining to apply a marketability disc ...
McCulloch v. McCulloch
Trial court abused its discretion when it assigned to wife stock in closely held company that made her a minority shareholder and when it failed to value the asset at issue; because the in-kind distribution left her with illiquid assets and no control ove ...
Davis v. Commissioner (II)
Eleventh Circuit upholds Tax Court’s $36.9 million valuation of executive stock option, finding that by using the parties’ negotiated formula for the number of shares equaling $16 million at the date of exercise and declining to apply a marketability disc ...
New case digests added to BVLaw in the last weeks
The following is a sampling of court decisions in which determination of the value of a business was essential to the result. Many of the leading financial experts and business appraisers were involved as consultants or expert witnesses in these matters. BVLaw digests all cases where valuation methodologies or competing approaches are adjudicated.
New updates to financial analysis decisions at BVLaw
Here are a sampling of cases where issues of business valuation factored in the final court decisions. As always, BVLaw Alert’s digests, and original court documents, are available for these and other breaking decisions.