Why Bankruptcy Court declines to be bound by divorce valuation
Following the divorce, the husband filed for Chapter 13 bankruptcy and asked for confirmation of his plan. The issue was whether the plan could meet the liquidation test applicable under the Bankruptcy Code’s section 1325(a)(4). In essence, the test requires that creditors in a Chapter 13 bankruptcy receive present value payments that are at least equal to the amount the creditors would receive in a Chapter 7 case.
Wagner v. Wagner
In key ruling, state high court “expressly” rejects bright-line requirement to apply minority and marketability discounts in all fair value determinations; court says discounts are “just another fact that a court may consider in determining fair value.”
Florida court resists call for bright-line rule on active-passive appreciation
In this age of entrepreneurship, valuators working on divorce cases often run into the issue of active and passive appreciation. But this issue not only comes up in the context of one spouse's ownership of a business that qualifies as separate property, as a recent Florida appeals court ruling shows. The case involved the husband's separate ownership of stock in a company for which he worked and the stock's substantial appreciation in value during the marriage. The wife asked for a rule "that all appreciation of the stock of a company for which a spouse works is a marital asset."
In re Discontinuance & Disposition of P.K. Smith Motors, Inc.
Trial court did not err when it enforced shareholder agreement lacking purchase price and based buyout price on defense expert testimony; opposing expert committed “severe flaws in his methodology and the valuations based upon them,” appeals court says.
Callahan v. Callahan
Appellate court says trial court did not double dip where it predicated its alimony order on husband’s general earning capacity, independent of husband’s employment at companies that were marital assets subject to property division.
Court Rejects Double-Dip Claim, Emphasizing Owner’s General Earning Capacity
Appellate court says trial court did not double dip where it predicated its alimony order on husband’s general earning capacity, independent of husband’s employment at companies that were marital assets subject to property division.
Lack of Marketability a Factor in Valuing Minority Interest
In buyout case, calculation of fair value of minority shareholder’s interest in restaurant turns on forensic accountant’s credit/cash ratio analysis; New York trial court says law recognizes lack of marketability as a factor in valuing closely held corpor ...
Cortes v. 3A N. Park Ave. Rest Corp.
In buyout case, calculation of fair value of minority shareholder’s interest in restaurant turns on forensic accountant’s credit/cash ratio analysis; New York trial court says law recognizes lack of marketability as a factor in valuing closely held corpor ...
In Buyout, Court Extols Expert’s Valuation and Legal Acumen
Appeals court affirms trial court’s valuation of oppressed shareholder’s minority interest in family business based on credentialed appraiser’s “clear, thorough, professional, and reliable” opinion and knowledge of New York valuation-related law.
In Buyout, Court Extols Expert’s Valuation and Legal Acumen
Appeals court affirms trial court’s valuation of oppressed shareholder’s minority interest in family business based on credentialed appraiser’s “clear, thorough, professional, and reliable” opinion and knowledge of New York valuation-related law.
Courts Decry Expert’s Failure to Explore Different Ways to Develop FMV
Appeals court affirms trial court’s valuation of medical practices based on buyout provisions where wife’s expert made no attempt to ascertain businesses’ FMV by any other valuation method.
Court Questions Idea of Goodwill in Solo Practice Valuation
Appeals court says distinction between professional goodwill and future earnings capacity “evanesces” when valuing solo professional practice; trial court erred in adopting value based on guideline transaction method that considered professional goodwill.
Murky Goodwill Testimony Makes Partner Agreement Best Indicator of Value
Trial court was justified in disregarding any commercial goodwill in husband’s interest in a professional practice and relying on partnership agreement, Texas appeals court finds, where goodwill is not accessible and expert testimony as to its existence a ...
Matter of Adelstein v. Finest Food Distributing Co. (II)
Appeals court affirms trial court’s valuation of oppressed shareholder’s minority interest in family business based on credentialed appraiser’s “clear, thorough, professional, and reliable” opinion and knowledge of New York valuation-related law.
Burstein v. Burstein
Appeals court affirms trial court’s valuation of medical practices based on buyout provisions where wife’s expert made no attempt to ascertain businesses’ FMV by any other valuation method.
Expert’s Valuation Method Precludes Improper Inclusion of Goodwill
In using the capitalization of earnings method to value husband’s medical practice, the wife’s expert did not improperly include personal goodwill, the appellate court finds; the valuation rested on actual earnings with some adjustment for reasonable comp ...
Sharp v. Sharp
In using the capitalization of earnings method to value husband’s medical practice, the wife’s expert did not improperly include personal goodwill, the appellate court finds; the valuation rested on actual earnings with some adjustment for reasonable comp ...
Matter of Adelstein v. Finest Food Distributing Co. (I)
In oppressed shareholder stock valuation proceeding, trial court credits testimony of credentialed appraiser, lauding his methodical approach, use of various methods to cross-check values, and understanding of legal principles related to valuation.
Business Valuation Cases in Brief
Business Valuation Cases in Brief by John J. Stockdale, Jr., JD Estate Valuations In the Estate of Farnam v. CIR, 130 T.C. No. 2 (February 4, 2008), the U.S. Tax Court concluded that loans made to a family business may not be aggregated with equity interests in that business in order to satisfy the 50% ‘‘interest’’ requirement needed to qualify for the family-owned business tax exemption. The court con- cluded that interest as used in ...