Expand the following panels for additional search options.

Interdisciplinary Appraisal Cannot Prevent Incomplete Valuation

In valuing husband’s partnership interest in rental-storage business, trial court could consider income-capitalization or cost approach and adopt valuation that included non-controlling (minority) interest discount of 33% based on real estate appraiser’s ...

Estate of Koons v. Commissioner

In determining the fair market value of a revocable trust’s interest in an LLC, the Tax Court adopts the IRS expert’s marketability discount and valuation; he rightly assumed it was reasonably foreseeable at the time of the decedent’s death that the trust ...

Pappas v. Pappas

In valuing husband’s partnership interest in rental-storage business, trial court could consider income capitalization or cost approach and adopt valuation that included non-controlling (minority) interest discount of 33% based on real estate appraiser’s ...

Halliday v. Halliday

Trial court did not overvalue husband’s interests in various businesses since it applied a DLOC whenever the husband did not have a 100% interest in the company and a DLOM that was consistent with expert testimony, state Court of Appeals finds.

Keig v. Keig

State Court of Appeals values husband’s interest in a family agricultural business at $1 million, including a discount for lack of control, and finds lower court’s $250,000 Grace award to spouse to compensate for exclusion of the value of the business fro ...

Caveney v. Caveney

Massachusetts Court of Appeals confirms that the fair value standard in divorce cases precludes application of any discount, either for lack of marketability or lack of control, for any closely held company, even highly restricted shares in family owned b ...

Short v. Short

Appraisal used in estate tax valuation, which included substantial discounts for lack of marketability and control, were inappropriate for use 10 years later in divorce.

Do you apply a DLOC in 50/50 ownership situations?

Doe v. Roe

Court confirms trial court’s application of double discounts (marketability and minority) and evidence of prior sales to value several closely held interests in divorce.

Can a Trial Court Value a Restaurant Based on Cash Flow But Ignore Gross Sales?

Husband appeals value of a restaurant that included only a portion of his expert report’s (cash flow) without accounting for the other portion (gross sales).

Foppe v. Foppe

Husband appeals value of a restaurant that included only a portion of his expert report’s (cash flow) without accounting for the other portion (gross sales).

In re Marriage of Williams

Montana high court rejects 35% minority discount to husband’s half interest in a closely held, family business, which he owned with his father and had equal say over operations, management, and application of funds.

Bussa v. Bussa

Divorce court discounts for flawed comparables and lack of control in valuation of four related companies.

Tax Court Declines to Tax Affect S Corp in Gift Transfer Case

In a post-Gross decision, the Tax Court considers tax affecting S corp earnings and also discounts for lack of marketability and control.

Dallas v. Commissioner

In a post-Gross decision, the Tax Court considers tax-affecting S Corp earnings and also discounts for lack of marketability and control.

Marketability discount may be applied where there is no impending sale but is within court’s discretion

The valuation issues in this marital dissolution were whether a discount for lack of marketability should have been applied to husband’s minority interests in two medical-practice businesses, and whether a buy-sell provision in a third business was determinative of that business's fair market value.

Built-In Capital Gains Liability of Small Minority Interest Should Be Discounted to Reflect Time Value of Money

The issues in this estate tax case were whether built-in capital gains tax liability should be discounted (indexed) to account for time value and the appropriate discounts for lack of marketability and control.

Estate of Jelke v. Commissioner (I)

The issues in this estate tax case were whether built-in capital gains tax liability should be discounted (indexed) to account for time value, and the appropriate discounts for lack of marketability and control.

Fausch v. Fausch

The valuation issues in this marital dissolution were whether a discount for lack of marketability should have been applied to husband's minority interests in two medical-practice businesses, and whether a buy-sell provision in a third business was determ ...

Use of fair market value reasonable even where recipient will obtain control

In this probate case, the court of appeals upheld the district court’s decision to use fair market value rather than ...

Husband’s version of the facts not supported by the record

Husband and wife were married in 1979, and wife filed for divorce in 2000.

Tax Court displeased with all experts’ DLOC and DLOM analyses

The primary issues in this gift tax case were the appropriate discounts for lack of control and lack of marketability to apply to gifted and sold interests of a family limited partnership.

Court Uses Raw Data From Bajaj Study to Determine DLOM

The only issue in this case was the fair market value of gifted family limited partnership (FLP) interests.

Tax Court Determines That Value Was 'Somewhere in the Middle' of Expert Opinions

The taxpayers' expert, Gregory Heebink, used the discounted cash flow (DCF) method and the guideline public company method.

Peracchio v. Commissioner

Issues were appropriate discount for lack of control and discount for lack of marketability to apply in valuing gifts of family limited partnership interests.

201 - 225 of 242 results