Estate of Dieringer v. Commissioner
Tax Court says executor of estate in series of post-death measures changed the value and size of decedent’s stock donation and may not claim date-of-death value of assets not actually transferred to family foundation; court affirms estate tax deficiency.
In re Estate of Bittner (Bittner II)
Appeals court affirms probate court’s ruling that ambiguous shareholder agreement requiring determination of fair market value of decedent’s minority interest in closely held companies accommodated use of discounts for lack of marketability and control.
Curran v. Curran
In share buyback case where parties agree to retain joint appraiser, whom they know from past appraisals of company, and commit to be bound by appraiser’s valuation, court declines to consider seller’s challenge to appraiser’s use of minority discount.
Husband's Roles in Company Negate Need for DLOC
Court affirms valuation of husband’s minority interest in business featuring zero DLOC where husband was key driving force behind business’s success and wielded influence and control; use of asset approach rendered double-dip theory inapplicable.
No Automatic Bar to Minority Discount in Divorce Cases
Appeals court says state law does not bar use of minority share discount in divorce cases and declines to impose a bright-line rule; rather, the trial court has to consider interest holder’s level of control and likelihood of sale before use of discount.
Court Affirms Rightness of Expert’s ‘Marital Value’ Calculation
Court upholds expert’s idiosyncratic valuation approach based on ascertaining “marital value” of community’s grocery stores as opposed to stores’ “investment value”; since the stores were not sold, valuation properly captured their value to owner spouse.
Sieber v. Sieber
Court affirms valuation of husband’s minority interest in business featuring zero DLOC where husband was key driving force behind business’s success and wielded influence and control; use of asset approach rendered double-dip theory inapplicable.
Schickner v. Schickner
Appeals court says state law does not bar use of minority share discount in divorce cases and declines to impose a bright-line rule; rather, the trial court has to consider interest holder’s level of control and likelihood of sale before use of discount.
In re Honer
Court upholds expert’s idiosyncratic valuation approach based on ascertaining “marital value” of community’s grocery stores as opposed to stores’ “investment value”; since the stores were not sold, valuation properly captured their value to owner spouse.
Use of Asset-Level Deductions Hinges on Business Strategy
State’s high court strikes down district court’s fair value determination, finding reliance on prior law prohibiting use of deductions was misguided where company pursued strategy of selling off real estate and other assets at time of triggering event.
Utah Resources International, Inc. v. Mark Technologies Corp.
State’s high court strikes down district court’s fair value determination, finding reliance on prior law prohibiting use of deductions was misguided where company pursued strategy of selling off real estate and other assets at time of triggering event.
Court Spotlights Lack of Control in Oil and Gas Interest Valuation
Appeals court affirms trial court’s discounting for lack of control and marketability in valuing oil and gas interests where trust’s ownership in interests was fractional and indirect and there was testimony regarding IRS’s estate tax discount rates.
In re Estate of Bittner (Bittner I)
Probate court says expert and other testimony aiding in interpretation of ambiguous shareholder agreement shows that fair market value determination of decedent’s minority interest allowed for use of discounts for lack of marketability and control.
Taubman v. U.S. Bank, N.A.
Appeals court affirms trial court’s discounting for lack of control and marketability in valuing oil and gas interests where trust’s ownership in interests was fractional and indirect and there was testimony regarding IRS’s estate tax discount rates.
Court Finds ‘Market Value Concept’ Requires Flexibility
Court says under Daubert a business valuator is qualified to value an investment company dealing in real estate since the company is not a piece of real estate but a business with diverse assets and finds real estate valuation is by nature “imprecise.”
Tax Ct. How-to of Valuing Holding Company, Avoiding Accuracy Penalty
Tax Court favors net-asset-value over capitalized-dividend approach for FMV determination of interest in holding company with marketable securities because NAV starts out on “firm ground” with stock prices one can look up whereas income approach relies en ...
Estate of Richmond
Tax Court favors net-asset-value over capitalized-dividend approach for FMV determination of interest in holding company with marketable securities because NAV starts out on “firm ground” with stock prices one can look up whereas income approach relies en ...
Marcus v. Quattrocchi
Court says under Daubert a business valuator is qualified to value an investment company dealing in real estate since the company is not a piece of real estate but a business with diverse assets and finds real estate valuation is by nature “imprecise.”
Tax Court Foils ‘End Run’ Around Expert Rules
Tax Court rejects taxpayer’s attempt to place in evidence a new appraisal regarding the decedent’s interest in an LLC whose principal asset was real estate by way of stipulation, finding he failed to qualify the appraiser as an expert and did not present ...
Court Rejects Expert’s Regression Equation to Determine DLOM
In determining the fair market value of a revocable trust’s interest in an LLC, the Tax Court adopts the IRS expert’s marketability discount and valuation; he rightly assumed it was reasonably foreseeable at the time of the decedent’s death that the trust ...
Estate of Tanenblatt v. Commissioner
Tax Court rejects taxpayer’s attempt to place in evidence a new appraisal regarding the decedent’s interest in an LLC whose principal asset was real estate by way of stipulation, finding he failed to qualify the appraiser as an expert and did not present ...