Donnelly v. ProPharma Grp. Topco LLC
The plaintiff sued for breach of contracts relating to ProPharma’s offer to have Donnelly join the board in 2016 and for not paying him for his incentive equity shares, implemented in 2017, at fair market value. Each side engaged an experienced business valuation expert to opine as to the fair market value of the equity shares. Each side now moved to exclude the testimony of the other side’s expert. The U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware denied the motions of both sides and allowed both experts to testify.
In a Breach of Contract Suit, the U.S. District Court Denies Motions to Exclude Valuation Experts
The plaintiff sued for breach of contracts relating to ProPharma’s offer to have Donnelly join the board in 2016 and for not paying him for his incentive equity shares, implemented in 2017, at fair market value. Each side engaged an experienced business valuation expert to opine as to the fair market value of the equity shares. Each side now moved to exclude the testimony of the other side’s expert. The U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware denied the motions of both sides and allowed both experts to testify.
Manichaean Capital, LLC v. SourceHOV Holdings, Inc.
In appraisal proceeding, Court of Chancery adopts petitioner expert’s DCF-based model for calculating fair value, making slight adjustment to expert’s size premium; on beta calculation, court finds respondent expert’s novel approach “does not survive judicial scrutiny” and raises Daubert issues.
Novel Beta Method Occasions Rebuke From Court of Chancery in Appraisal Case
In appraisal proceeding, Court of Chancery adopts petitioner expert’s DCF-based model for calculating fair value, making slight adjustment to expert’s size premium; on beta calculation, court finds respondent expert’s novel approach “does not survive judicial scrutiny” and raises Daubert issues.
Helen Ziegler Benjamin v. Island Management
In a family dispute featuring related closely held companies and claims of breach of fiduciary duty and mismanagement, court, based on financial testimony from plaintiffs’ expert, orders inspection of defendant company’s records, including general ledger, fee agreements, and executive compensation.
Financial Expert Testimony Persuades Court to Order Inspection of Company Records
In a family dispute featuring related closely held companies and claims of breach of fiduciary duty and mismanagement, court, based on financial testimony from plaintiffs’ expert, orders inspection of defendant company’s records, including general ledger, fee agreements, and executive compensation.
Remy v. Lubbock Nat’l Bank
In ESOP case, court finds ERISA provides for right to contribution among co-fiduciaries but finds trustee defendant has no right to contribution from nonfiduciary ESOP appraiser if trustee were found liable to ESOP for losses; court dismisses third-party complaint against ESOP appraiser.
Trustee’s Claim for Contribution Against ESOP Appraiser Collapses
In ESOP case, court finds ERISA provides for right to contribution among co-fiduciaries but finds trustee defendant has no right to contribution from nonfiduciary ESOP appraiser if trustee were found liable to ESOP for losses; court dismisses third-party complaint against ESOP appraiser.
Court Limits Damages for Copyright Infringement, Noting Lack of ‘Causal Nexus’
Ruling on defendant’s post-trial motions, court reduces damages for copyright infringement where plaintiff’s expert included in damage calculation defendant’s profits for years for which the plaintiff failed to show “causal nexus” between profits claimed and the actual infringement.
Infogroup, Inc. v. Database USA.com LLC
Ruling on defendant’s post-trial motions, court reduces damages for copyright infringement where plaintiff’s expert included in damage calculation defendant’s profits for years for which the plaintiff failed to show “causal nexus” between profits claimed and the actual infringement.
Washington Court Explains Principle Guiding Double-Dip Analysis
Appeals court says there was no double dipping where the business, valued under an income approach, was a going concern, not a fixed asset, and would continue to generate income for owner spouse with which to pay maintenance award to nonowner spouse.
Washington Court Explains Principle Guiding Double-Dip Analysis
Appeals court says there was no double dipping where the business, valued under an income approach, was a going concern, not a fixed asset, and would continue to generate income for owner spouse with which to pay maintenance award to nonowner spouse.
In re Marriage of Cheng
Appeals court says there was no double dipping where the business, valued under an income approach, was a going concern, not a fixed asset, and would continue to generate income for owner spouse with which to pay maintenance award to nonowner spouse.
Danger of ‘Limited Appraisal’ in Divorce
Court dismisses wife’s claim fraud against the husband, finding that she accepted $1 million for her share in the marital business, based on a limited appraisal, and waited too long after finding out the company sold for $54 million to bring her suit.
Divorce Court Credits Buy-Sell (and Discredits ‘Controlling’ Owner) in Business Value
Court credits buy-sell in valuation of consulting business.
Silver v. Silver
Court credits buy-sell in valuation of consulting business.
Valuation based on financial statements upheld
One issue in this marital dissolution was whether the trial court abused its discretion in its valuation of husband’s one-third partnership interest in the marketing firm, Results Unlimited.
Amsbaugh v. Amsbaugh
Wife's valuation purely speculative, court's valuation based on records indicating loss upheld.
Woodward v. North Carolina Management Company
Trial court fails to address issue before jury of payments made but enters judgement anyway.
Low-End Revenue Multiplier Accounts for Corporate Debts
This case involved a claim for unpaid commissions and stock buyout valuation by Jon Billigmeier, the minority owner of Concorde Marketing Inc. , against the corporation and Glenn Willing, the majority owner.
Billigmeier v. Concorde Marketing, Inc.
Claim for unpaid commissions and stock buyout valuation by the minority owner of Concorde Marketing, Inc. against the corporation and the majority owner.
Freeman v. Freeman
At issue is the valuation of husband's interest in a technology business and the possible error by the trial court of not instructing the parties to submit expert testimony as to the value o ...
Competent evidence of net asset value presented: No court-appointed expert required
One of the primary issues in this marital dissolution is the characterization and valuation of the husband's 50% interest in Advanced Technology Resources Inc.
Prior purchase of 50% of stock sets floor for valuation
One of the primary issues in this marital dissolution was the valuation of GSP Marketing Services, Inc., of which husband was the sole shareholder.
In re the Marriage of Grunsten
At issue is the valuation of husband's marketing business.