Conway v. Conway
At issue is the goodwill value of the husband's medical practice.
Louisiana Court of Appeals reverses trial court's valuation of husband's medical practice
Court of Appeals reversed the trial court valuation of husband's medical practice on the grounds that "the evidence presented by both parties as to the valuation of the corporation is patent ...
Picazo v. Picazo
At issue is the valuation of the marital property including husband's medical practice.
Fox v. Fox
At issue is the valuation of husband's medical practice.
Husband’s Income, Not Business Value, Considered in Alimony Reward
No evidence was presented regarding the valuation of husband's medical practice, but his income therefrom was taken into account by the court in awarding alimony to wife.
Joanne Sandra Dale v. Thomas Redding Dale, et al.
The California Court of Appeals for the Fourth District permitted a defrauded spouse to bring a tort action for concealment of community assets (fraud in connection with a marital settlement agreement by misrepresenting the value of his business) as an al ...
Suit for Damages Arising From Misrepresentation of Value Permitted
The California Court of Appeals for the Fourth District permitted a defrauded spouse to bring a tort action for concealment of community assets (fraud in connection with a marital settlement agreement by misrepresenting the value of his business) as an al ...
EEC Property Company v. Kaplan, et al.
EEC Property Co. sought to vacate or modify arbitrator's decision in favor of two partners, awarding damages for waste of partnership assets and setting terms of buyout of two partners' interests.
Enrique Andres Silberblatt v. Lori Ann Silberblatt (Silberblatt I)
The Virginia Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court's characterization and valuation of a medical practice specializing in plastic surgery. The trial court characterized the entire value of the practice as marital property even though it was establish ...
Sweat Equity Included in Value of Medical Practice
The Virginia Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court's characterization and valuation of a medical practice specializing in plastic surgery.
Noncompetitive Factors Must Be Considered When Assessing Damages for a Division of the Market
The U.S. Court of Appeals affirmed the lower court's grant of summary judgment against Blue Cross in its antitrust suit against Marshfield Clinics. The clinics were guilty of monopolistic practices (i.e., division of the market).
Blue Cross and Blue Shield United of Wisconsin, and Compcare Health Services Insurance Corporation v
The U.S. Court of Appeals affirmed the lower court's grant of summary judgment against Blue Cross in its antitrust suit against Marshfield Clinics. The clinics were guilty of monopolistic practices (i.e., division of the market).
EEC Property Company v. Kaplan, et al.
EEC Property Co. was a general partnership of six ophthalmologists formed to own and operate a medical office building.
Salem Med. Arts & Dev. Corp. v. Columbiana Cty. Bd. of Revision
The Ohio Supreme Court affirmed the Board of Tax Appeals finding that the value of real property is not equal the value of the company holding the real property when the property is the company's only asset.
Value of a Company Holding One Property Is Not the Value of That Property
The Ohio Supreme Court affirmed the Board of Tax Appeals finding that the value of real property is not equal to the value of the company holding the real property when the property is the company's only asset.
EEC Property v. Kaplan
At issue is breach of fiduciary duty.
In re Marriage of Dieterle
One issue in this case was the inclusion of accounts receivable, patient charts and goodwill into the value of husbands medical practice.
Value of a Professional Practice Is Not Diminished by the Professional’s Outstanding Student Loans
The Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District, reversed a lower court's valuation of a medical practice at zero over expert testimony.
Judge calculates goodwill based on physician compensation survey
On appeal from a 1994 equitable distribution trial, husband (plaintiff) appeals the value of his medical practice as determined by the Trial Judge. Husband is a cardiologist trained in the s ...
Mark D. Wojtowicz, M.D. v. Greeley Anesthesia Services, P.C.
The Colorado Court of Appeals concluded that liquidated damages provisions in an anesthesiology practice's noncompete agreement were unenforceable because they were disproportionate to any actual injury. The liquidated damages provisions required the com ...
More Court Cases ... Covenant Not to Compete
This case concerns a geographic covenant not to compete among a group of doctors.
Valley Medical Specialists v. Farber
At issue is a covenant not to compete, in which a departing doctor could not practice medicine within five miles of any corporation office for a period of three years.
Goodwill Not Partnership Asset Subject to Division
Two partners in a Texas radiology practice partnership, Salinas and Salazar, decided to terminate the partnership.
Carlson v. Carlson
At issue is the methodology employed by the trial court in determining the value of two marital assets, a ten-acre tract of land and plaintiff's medical practice.
Salinas v. Rafati
At issue is consider whether an award to a physician for his interest in a professional partnership upon dissolution is supported by any evidence and whether the intangible assets of the disolved partnership include the goodwill and earning capacities.