Interactive Pictures Corp. v. Infinite Pictures, Inc.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed the district court’s reasonable royalty award for patent infringement based on a hypothetical negotiation. The court concluded that a paid up royalty of 10% over five years was appropriate. The aw ...
Reasonable Royalty Based on Hypothetical Negotiation
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed the district court’s reasonable royalty award for patent infringement based on a hypothetical negotiation. The court concluded that a paid up royalty of 10% over five years was appropriate. The aw ...
Lost Profits Denied in Internet Infringement Case
The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California granted summary judgment on the issue of lost profits in this Internet trademark infringement case. Oyster’s expert reasoned that the decline in the number of hits to Oyster’s website during ...
Oyster Software, Inc. v. Forms Processing, Inc., et al.
The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California granted summary judgment on the issue of lost profits in this Internet trademark infringement case. Oyster’s expert reasoned that the decline in the number of hits to Oyster’s website during ...
Kinesoft Development Corporation v. Softbank Holdings Inc.
The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois declined to award future lost profits to a computer game developer and applied the new business rule in this breach of contract case.
New Business Rule Applied to Business With Operating History
The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois declined to award future lost profits to a computer game developer and applied the new business rule in this breach of contract case.
Bankruptcy Court Determines Fair Market Value Under Pennsylvania Judgment—Court Details Claimant's Expert's Valuation Shortcomings
The issue in this bankruptcy court proceeding is the appropriate valuation of 4,500 shares of stock of Quality Systems Associates Inc. (QSA).
In re Robert E. Mahoney, Jr. Debtor
At issue is the fair market value of 4,500 shares of Quality Systems Associates Inc.
Charles Knox v. Microsoft Corporation
The Washington Court of Appeals reversed two summery judgments in favor of Microsoft in this breach of employment contract matter.
Damages for Cancellation of Stock Options Recoverable for Breach of Employment Contract
The Washington Court of Appeals reversed two summery judgments in favor of Microsoft in this breach of employment contract matter.
Richard E. Graham v. Larry James
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit affirmed in part and reversed in part a lower court's award of damages for breach of contract and copyright infringement.
Actual Damages for Breach of Oral Contract Held to Contract Terms
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit affirmed in part and reversed in part a lower court's award of damages for breach of contract and copyright infringement.
Buyer's public stock paid in acquisition drops 57% in 100 days
On Aug. 30, 1995, pursuant to a June 1995 letter of intent, Wonderware Corp. acquired all of the stock of Soft Systems Engineering Inc. (SSE) for 172,598 shares of Wonderware stock, valued at $6,399,071, based on $37.075 per share average of its last 20 days' closing Nasdaq price.
Voit v. Wonderware
At issue is plaintiff's claim that defendants' failure to disclose changes in business operations and personnel resulted in inflated values of the Wonderware stock used to purchase an enginering company.
More Court Cases... Shareholder Dispute: Cheyenne Software
Claiming a breach of fiduciary duties by the Cheyenne Software Board of Directors, the shareholders sought to have a preliminary injunction issued to delay an all-cash offer for the company.
In re Cheyenne Software Shareholders Litigation
At issue is breach of fiduciary duties and the value of Cheyenne stock at the time of a merger with Computer Associates, Inc.
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5 (current)