Whitesell Corp. v. Electrolux Home Prods.
In this Rule 26 discovery case, court says sanctions are inappropriate where the defendant had no duty to disclose its expert’s “intermediary” working paper; however, sanctions are appropriate related to the expert’s miscalculations; court finds expert testimony is admissible under Daubert.
Expert’s Damages Testimony Prompts Motion for Sanctions and Motion to Exclude Under Daubert
In this Rule 26 discovery case, court says sanctions are inappropriate where the defendant had no duty to disclose its expert’s “intermediary” working paper; however, sanctions are appropriate related to the expert’s miscalculations; court finds expert testimony is admissible under Daubert.
Reversal of Fortune: $1.45 Billion Verdict Vacated for Lack of Fraud-Free Valuation
Court reverses $1.45 billion jury verdict based on lack of “fraud-free” valuation of securities.
Morgan Stanley & Co. Inc. v. Coleman (Parent) Holdings Inc.
Florida Court of Appeals reverses largest jury verdict to date for economic damages ($1.45 billion) for lack of "fraud-free" evidence related to claims that investment bank helped to fraudulently inflate the value of plaintiff's target acquisition (Sunbea ...
Bonnie L. Toth v. Julius Toth
The Ohio Court of Appeals, Ninth District, affirmed the court appointed appraiser’s valuation of a home appliance business. The court appointed appraiser and the wife’s expert determined that the 1998 financials were unreliable. The court appointed expert ...
Lorna J. Wendt v. Gary C. Wendt
The Connecticut Superior Court considered a number of issues in this high profile divorce, including the value of vested and unvested stock option of a successful corporate executive.
Wendt Court Finds Black-Scholes Method Inappropriate for Valuing Employee Stock Options
The Connecticut Superior Court considered a number of issues in this high profile divorce, including the value of vested and unvested stock option of a successful corporate executive.