Federal Circuit Affirms $95 Million Patent Award Based on Price Erosion Theory
Federal Circuit finds jury’s lost profits and reasonable royalty award based on plaintiffs’ price erosion theory is not excessive; sufficient evidence supported expert’s “but for” damages model calculating prices two to three times as much as the prices t ...
SynQor, Inc. v. Artesyn Technologies, Inc. (III)
Federal Circuit finds jury’s lost profits and reasonable royalty award based on plaintiffs’ price erosion theory is not excessive; sufficient evidence supported expert’s “but for” damages model calculating prices two to three times as much as the prices t ...
Careful Benchmarking and Georgia-Pacific Analysis Sustain $95 Million Patent Award
Federal court found sufficient evidence to support $95 million lost profits and reasonable royalty award for patent infringement based on expert’s careful benchmarking and Georgia-Pacific analysis ...
Careful Benchmarking and Georgia-Pacific Analysis Sustain $95 Million Patent Award
Federal court denies motion for new trial in patent infringement case, finding among other evidentiary and legal rulings that the plaintiffs did not improperly apply the entire market value rule.
SynQor, Inc. v. Artesyn Technologies, Inc. (I)
Federal court found sufficient evidence to support $95 million lost profits and reasonable royalty award for patent infringement based on expert’s careful benchmarking and Georgia-Pacific analysis.
SynQor, Inc. v. Artesyn Technologies, Inc. (II)
Federal court denies motion for new trial in patent infringement case, finding among other evidentiary and legal rulings that the plaintiffs did not improperly apply the entire market value rule.
Nilssen v. Motorola, Inc. (II)
When this case accusing Motorola of violating patent, contract, and trade secret rights became one of the oldest on its docket, the district court decided to expedite matters by splitting the case in two.
Delta Star v. Patton
One issue in this case was diminution of value caused by a breach of loyalty.
Nilssen v. Motorola, Inc. (I)
Issues involve several motions in limine to exclude expert testimony in intellectual property dispute.