Expand the following panels for additional search options.

Experts Need Not Be ‘Blue-Ribbon Practitioners’ to Meet Rule 702 Qualification Requirement

In bankruptcy dispute, court rejects parties’ Daubert challenge to opposing expert testimony; defense expert did not blindly rely on management projections for capital adequacy and balance sheet tests, and plaintiff’s expert did not use hindsight to find debtor was insolvent on fund transfer dates.

Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors v. Calpers Corp. Partners, LLC

In bankruptcy dispute, court rejects parties’ Daubert challenge to opposing expert testimony; defense expert did not blindly rely on management projections for capital adequacy and balance sheet tests, and plaintiff’s expert did not use hindsight to find debtor was insolvent on fund transfer dates.

Estate of Verna Mae Crosby v. U.S.A.

The U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi determined the value of a promissory note. The experts valued the note by computing the present value of the future payments at an appropriate yield adjusted for specific factors impacting ...

Valuation of a Promissory Note

The U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi determined the value of a promissory note.

4 results