Colclasure v. Colclasure
State Supreme Court finds trial court erred in valuing husband’s business interest based on buy-out agreement the parties ignored; on remand, valuation must meet statutory requirement of a fair and just division.
Consideration of Post-Dissolution Events Improper
The issue in this post-dissolution matter was whether the court erred in re-evaluating the original valuation of the husband’s business.
Pattinson v. Pattinson (II)
Issue in this post-dissolution matter was whether the court erred in re-evaluating the original valuation of the husband’s business.
Losses Not Flowing From the Breach Must Be Considered When Establishing Lost Profits Flowing From Breach of Noncompete Agreement
The Minnesota Court of Appeals reversed an award of lost past and future profits for breach of a noncompete agreement.
Loss of Profitability Seemingly Related to the Parties’ Separation Ignored
On appeal, husband challenges the trial court's finding that the fair market value of his carpet installation business was $35,000. He asserts that the wife's expert valued the business lowe ...
Pattinson v. Pattinson (I)
At issue is the valuation of husband's carpet business.
No Adjustment for Initial Liability Understatement
The valuation issue in this case is the value to be placed on husband's carpet installation business, a sole proprietorship. Husband appealed the trial court's $160,000 valuation of his carp ...
Street v. Street
At issue is the valuation of husband's carpet business and the couple's marital home.