In re Prince
At issue is the equity value of Dr. Prince's stock in his orthodontics corporation.
Arbuckle v. Arbuckle
Issue is discounting the value of husband's dental practice and wife's oil stock by estimated capital gains taxes on a hypothetical sales.
No 'Accountancy' Approach; Court Upholds Arbitration
Gregory J. Grambow, former president of Associated Dental Services Inc., (ADS Inc.), had 20% stock interest in ADS Inc.
Gregory J. Grambow v. Associated Dental Services
At issue is whether the determination of the value of Grambow's shares under a post-employment stock redemption plan is not subject to arbitration and, therefore, the arbitrators exceeded their authority when they determined the value of the shares.
Non-compete covenant not a marital asset, but allocation of value to it must be fai
The divorce decree awarded the dental practice to husband, subject to an interest in favor of the wife of 50% of the gross funds received in excess of $80,000 from the sale of the practice.
Monaghan v. Monaghan
At issue is the valuation of husband's dental practice.
In re the Marriage of Monaghan
Issue was whether covenant not to compete from sale of dental practice was separate or marital asset.
Tortorich v. Tortorich
At issue is the value of the husband's oral surgery practice.
Berger v. Berger
At issue is the valuation of husband's dental practice.
Strauss v. Strauss
At issue is the valuation of professional goodwill as maritial property and the valuation of tangible assets of husband's dental practice.
Weinstock v. Weinstock
At issue is the valuation of goodwill attributable to a professional practice.
Theilen v. Theilen
At issue is the valuation of husband's business interests in a dental equipment company, dental practice, and real estate partnership.
Cohn v. Cohn
One issue in this case was the valuation of a dental practice.
Haas v. Haas
Issue was the value of husband's orthodontic practice and whether the court erred in not considering that he did not own 100% of the stock due to a gift of 5% to his daughter.
Sorensen v. Sorensen
Issues were valuation and distribution of husband's dental practice and allocation of expert witness fees.
Reichert v. Reichert
Issue is whether trial court erred in valuing husband's dental practice, which valuation included goodwill.
Hollander v. Hollander
One issue in this case was the basis for which a dental practice was valued.
Fexa v. Fexa
Issue is whether the trial court erred in excluding any goodwill value from the valuation of husband's dental practice.
In Re Marriage of Hogeland
Appeals court says where professional will continue practice, goodwill is a factor in determining future earnings capacity for purposes of alimony; however, trial court erred when it also treated goodwill as an asset in valuation of practice’s stock.
Donahue v. Donahue
Issues are whether wife has an interest in husband's dental practice and whether goodwill of dental practice is subject to equitable distribution.
Johnston v. Johnston
One issue in this case was whether a covenant not to compete should be included in the valuation of husband's dental practice.
Peerenboom v. Peerenboom
Issue was the valuation of husband's dental practice, including the value of goodwill.
Hillebrand v. Hillebrand
One issue in this case was the valuation of business assets inside the marital estate.
Poore v. Poore
The issue was how a solely-owned professional association should be valued for purposes of equitable distribution.
Wehrkamp v. Wehrkamp
Issue is whether an individual's future earning capacity resulting from an advanced degree is "property" in divorce cases?