Molloy v. Molloy
At issue is the valuation of the goodwill of the husband's law practice.
Metzner v. Metzner
Issue was whether compensation that attorney might receive for contingent fee contracts and other future earned fees for cases which are pending at the time of divorce is marital property.
Naddeo v. Naddeo
Issue is proper valuation date of partnership in law practice that was voluntarily dissolved after separation but prior to distribution.
In re Marriage of Tietz
At issue is the valuation of husband's law practice.
Ford v. Ford
One issue in this case was the valuation of a professional corporation and the exclusion of goodwill in that valuation.
In re Marriage of Gunn
One issue in this case was the valuation of husband's shares in a professional corporation.
In re Marriage of Huff
At issue was the value of husband's interest in his law firm.
Kilbourne v. Kilbourne
At issue was the value of husband's law practice.
Miles v. Miles
At issue is whether husband's lobbying practice has goodwill value.
Postema v. Postema
At issue is the valuation of husband's law degree.
In re Marriage of Zells
At issue is whether or not a lawyer's contingent fee contracts and professional goodwill are subject to valuation, division or distribution as marital assets.
Thompson v. Thompson
At issue is whether or not professional goodwill should be considered marital property.
Prahinski v. Prahinski (II)
One issue in this case was the value of goodwill in a solo law practice.
Travis v. Travis
The issue in this case was the valuation of goodwill in a law practice and it being included in the marital estate.
Quinn v. Quinn
One issue in this case was the husband's post-separation efforts to increase the value of certain property and whether or not they were included in the valuation of that property.
McCabe v. McCabe
Issue was whether trial court erred in determining a value for husband's partnership interest in a law firm and whether the partnership withdrawal agreement is controlling.
Richmond v. Richmond
At issue is the value of husband's law firm, alimony, child support, and attorney fees.
Green v. Green
At issue is the proper date for valuation of the community interest in a husband's law practice.
Thompson v. Thompson
At issue is the goodwill of the husband's legal practice.
Hirsch v. Hirsch
Issue is whether the trial court erred in the instructions and questions given to the jury in connection with the value of husband's law practice.
Prahinski v. Prahinski (I)
75 Md. App. 113 (1988) 540 A.2d 833 LEO PRAHINSKI v. MARGARET E. PRAHINSKI. No. 1187, September Term, 1987. Court of Special Appeals of Maryland. May 6, 1988. Certiorari Granted September 2, 1988. Cheryl Lynn Hepfer (Meehan, Kovach and Hepfer, P.A., on the brief), Upper Marlboro, for appellant. Marvin E. Perlis, Silver Spring, for appellee. Argued before MOYLAN, BLOOM and POLLITT, JJ. BLOOM, Judge. Leo Prahinski appeals from a judgment of the Circuit Court ...
In re the Marriage of Brooks
Issue is whether the goodwill in the husband's law partnership is community or separate property.
In re Marriage of Stone
At issue is the valuation of the maritial property and husband's interest in law partnership.
Beasley v. Beasley
Issue is whether goodwill is a component of the value of a professional law practice and to be considered marital property.
Garrity v. Bishton
One issue in this case was the valuation of a law practice.