Expand the following panels for additional search options.

Valuations Bolster IRS’s Transferee Liability Claim

In transferee liability case, Tax Court finds IRS proved petitioner was liable for causing company’s fraudulent asset transfers and benefitted from intermediary company’s fraudulent transfer; valuations showed company was insolvent at time of transfers.

Cullifer v. Commissioner

In transferee liability case, Tax Court finds IRS proved petitioner was liable for causing company’s fraudulent asset transfers and benefitted from intermediary company’s fraudulent transfer; valuations showed company was insolvent at time of transfers.

Adjusting Appraisals, Court Estimates ESOP Target’s Value

After determining defendants breached fiduciary ERISA duties in ESOP transaction, the federal court adjusts two nearly contemporaneous valuations of the target company to arrive at a “reasonable estimate” of the target’s fair market value ...

Chesemore v. Alliance Holdings, Inc. (II)

After determining defendants breached fiduciary ERISA duties in ESOP transaction, the federal court adjusts two nearly contemporaneous valuations of the target company to arrive at a “reasonable estimate” of the target’s fair market value and the plaintif ...

Management Buyout Fraught With Flawed ESOP Valuations

Federal district court makes extensive finding regarding breaches of fiduciary duties for ESOP trustees that caused company to enter heavily leveraged buyout despite falling forecasts and flawed valuations marred by manager conflicts of interest.

Chesemore v. Alliance Holdings, Inc. (I)

: Federal district court makes extensive finding regarding breaches of fiduciary duties for ESOP trustees that caused company to enter heavily leveraged buyout despite falling forecasts and flawed valuations marred by manager conflicts of interest.

Signature Distribution Services, Inc. v. James E. Wright, et al.

The North Carolina Court of Appeals affirmed a lost profits award.

More Court Cases... Marital Dissolution: Milbauer

The parties were in significant disagreement with respect to the value of the defendant's interest in a business (a warehousing and freight forwarding company that augmented the defendant's ...

Arnold D. Waller v. American International Distribution Corporation, et al.

The Vermont Supreme Court affirmed the lower court valuation of a company using the discounted future earning method in a oppressed shareholder action. The Supreme Court further affirmed the lower court's normalization of the company's earnings and the r ...

Minority Discount Inapplicable Where Majority Oppression Evidenced

The Vermont Supreme Court affirmed the lower court valuation of a company using the discounted future earning method in a oppressed shareholder action.

Milbauer v. Milbauer

At issue is the value of the defendant's interest in UFO Distribution Corporation.

11 results