Jewelry and Silverware Manufacturing
This industry comprises establishments primarily engaged in one or more of the following: (1) manufacturing, engraving, chasing, or etching fine and costume jewelry; (2) manufacturing, engraving, chasing, or etching metal personal goods (i.e., small articles carried on or about the person, such as compacts or cigarette cases); (3) manufacturing, engraving, chasing, or etching precious metal solid, precious metal clad, or pewter flatware and other hollowware; (4) stamping coins; (5) manufacturing unassembled jewelry parts and stock shop products, such as sheet, wire, and tubing; (6) cutting, slabbing, tumbling, carving, engraving, polishing, or faceting precious or semiprecious stones and gems; (7) recutting, repolishing, and setting gem stones; and (8) drilling, sawing, and peeling cultured and costume pearls. This industry includes establishments primarily engaged in manufacturing precious solid, precious clad, and precious plated jewelry and personal goods.
Right to use of trade name does not include goodwill
The Appellate Division of the Supreme Court upheld the lower court's ruling that a clause in the shareholder agreement giving certain shareholders the exclusive right to continued use of a trade name did not explicitly give them the right to the value of the corporation's goodwill associated with the trade name ...
In re Penny Preville, Inc.
In a proceeding pursuant to Business Corporation Law § 1104-a for the judicial dissolution of a closely-held corporation, Jay Siskin and Penny Siskin appeal from an order of the Supreme ...
In re Leslie & Penny
In a proceeding pursuant to Business Corporation Law § 1104-a for the judicial dissolution of a closely-held corporation, Jay Siskin and Penny Siskin appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Austin, J.), dated July 3, 2002, which determined that the corporate trade name "Penny Preville" was a corporate asset and that its value was subject to distribution in dissolution.
On Davis v. The Gap, Inc.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed in part and reversed in part the lower court’s decision not to award damages for The Gap’s infringement of Davis’ copyright. The Gap used Davis’ copyrighted eyewear in an advertisement. The appella ...
Fair Market Value of License Fee May Be Recovered as Actual Damages
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed in part and reversed in part the lower court’s decision not to award damages for The Gap’s infringement of Davis’ copyright. The Gap used Davis’ copyrighted eyewear in an advertisement. The appella ...