Trial Court Misinterprets Damages Rules for Design Patent Violation
Federal Circuit rejects design patent infringement award where prevailing expert improperly apportioned the infringer’s profits and jury failed to determine infringer’s profits but, against the weight of the evidence, simply stated they equaled zero.
Nordock, Inc. v. Systems, Inc.
Federal Circuit rejects design patent infringement award where prevailing expert improperly apportioned the infringer’s profits and jury failed to determine infringer’s profits but, against the weight of the evidence, simply stated they equaled zero.
Valuation Evidence Helps Support Trustee’s Successful Claims
Bankruptcy court voids $6 million paid for company as a fraudulent transfer, when valuation evidence shows it was worth no more than $4 million as a going concern at time of sale.
Boyer v. Crown Stock Distribution, Inc.
Bankruptcy court voids $6 million paid for company as a fraudulent transfer, when valuation evidence shows it was worth no more than $4 million as a going concern at time of sale.
Balance Dynamics Corporation v. Schmitt Industries, Incorporated
On an issue of first impression, the Sixth Circuit concluded that Balance Dynamics could recover its damage control costs under the Lanham Act which stemmed from Schmitt Industries' false advertising. The court determined that recovery was based on a thr ...
Damage Control Costs Recovered Under the Lanham Act
On an issue of first impression, the Sixth Circuit concluded that Balance Dynamics could recover its damage control costs under the Lanham Act which stemmed from Schmitt Industries' false advertising. The court determined that recovery was based on a thr ...