Partnership Agreement's Ambiguity Enters Into Business Valuation
Appellant (Farley) alleges that a partnership agreement was ambiguous and entitled the partner to the "book value" of the partnership interest.
Farley v. Klaus, Smith & Ressling
At issue is whether a partnership agreement is ambiguous, if it requires a cash basis method of accounting and entitles an expelled partner to the "book value" of the partnership interest as determined by a complete inventory and accounting.
Miller v. Electrical Equipment
At issue is a dispute between the deceased owner's estate and the surviving owner over the value of a fifty percent interest in the company that focuses on the allocation of the policy proceeds.
Buy-Sell Agreement
The case is a dispute about the value of 25% interest in a medical corporation pursuant to a buy-sell agreement.
Buy-Sell Valuation Driven by Actual Facts
The issue in this case is the value to be paid to one 50% equity holder of a PC.
Dorsey v. Contemporary Obstetrics
At issue is whether corporate goodwill should have been considered in the valuation of the plaintiff's shares of stock in the defendant company.
Reeves v. McReynolds
At issue is the valuation of the plaintiff's interest in the pediatrics corporation and partnership formed with the defendant.
'Book Value' by 'General Accounting Principles' Does Not Necessarily Mean GAAP
Defendant, Oliver Trittler Jr., is the personal representative of an estate.
No 'Accountancy' Approach; Court Upholds Arbitration
Gregory J. Grambow, former president of Associated Dental Services Inc., (ADS Inc.), had 20% stock interest in ADS Inc.
Lake Cable and Buhrow v. Trittler
At issue is whether the term "book value" was erroneously interpreted, resulting in a calculation of a substantially insufficient value, in corporate stock restriction agreement.
Gregory J. Grambow v. Associated Dental Services
At issue is whether the determination of the value of Grambow's shares under a post-employment stock redemption plan is not subject to arbitration and, therefore, the arbitrators exceeded their authority when they determined the value of the shares.
Court Upholds Discounts Imposed by Arbitrator
Limited partners put interests in a cable television partnership to the general partner under put and call provisions of the partnership agreement.
Wojdak v. Greater Philadelphia Cablevision
At issue is the defendant's appraisal of the fair market value of the put interests of the plaintiff's partnership.