Trustee Claims Bankruptcy Court Flouted Valuation Rules
District court affirms bankruptcy court’s valuation of hospital under income approach and finds its treating a $20.6 million capital transfer as surplus rather than a necessary asset for operations is not double counting and is reasonable under the facts ...
In re Civic Partners Sioux City, LLC
The Bankruptcy Court finds the debtor’s reorganization plan is not feasible because it fails to provide enough funds to pay in full the primary creditor’s secured claim; the plan rested on an improperly low valuation of the property that makes up the majo ...
What ‘FMV’? Bankruptcy Court Restricts Car Dealer’s Damages
Bankruptcy court finds car dealer’s claim for fair market value of its franchise based on state law dealer statute is invalid under Bankruptcy Code; expert testimony only supports past lost profit damages for cars and parts and accessories in stock at tim ...
Court Approves Debtor’s ‘Feasible, But Tight’ Plan With 6% Interest Rate
In Chapter 11 proceeding, Bankruptcy Court approves debtor hotel owner’s reorganization plan over objection of creditor that holds both secured and unsecured claims; applying the “Till formula approach,” the court decides the plan’s proposed 6% “cramdown”
In re Eastman Kodak Company
Bankruptcy court denies shareholders’ renewed request for an equity committee, finding neither the debtor nor its creditors are hiding value in their calculation of the total equity value of less than $500 million; expert testimony as to the allegedly und ...
Alberts v. HCA, Inc.
District court affirms bankruptcy court’s valuation of hospital under income approach and finds its treating a $20.6 million capital transfer as surplus rather than a necessary asset for operations is not double counting and is reasonable under the facts ...
Court Credits Expert’s Cash Flow Analysis in Solvency Determination
Bankruptcy Court credits trustee’s expert’s cash flow analysis in finding “billionaire” debtor was insolvent at the time she signed a guarantee for a $13 million loan defendant made to her son; because the transfer was fraudulent, the court sets aside the ...
Whyte v. C/R Energy Coinvestment II, L.P. (In re SemCrud)
Bankruptcy Court values Chapter 11 debtor on a going concern basis and finds the income approach is best suited to determine solvency at the time of critical financial transactions; the defendants’ expert properly relied on a contemporaneous Goldman Sachs ...
In re: American Suzuki Motor Corporation
Bankruptcy court finds car dealer’s claim for fair market value of its franchise based on state law dealer statute is invalid under Bankruptcy Code; expert testimony only supports past lost profit damages for cars and parts and accessories in stock at tim ...
In Re: LMR, LLC
In Chapter 11 proceeding, Bankruptcy Court approves debtor hotel owner’s reorganization plan over objection of creditor that holds both secured and unsecured claims; applying the “Till formula approach,” the court decides the plan’s proposed 6% “cramdown”
Expert’s ‘Unsupportable’ Inputs Undermine DCF Analysis and Credibility
District court finds expert “forced” spun-off company’s low value by calculating a DCF value that “is low in the extreme and implied an incredibly low trading multiple for the [subject]”; the expert selected “the most pessimistic projections” of future pe ...
Expert May Use Public Information for Company Valuation
Federal court admits experts’ determination of company’s capitalization based on publicly available information under Daubert, stating that even though using this type of information is not the preferred method, it may be acceptable when the company’s sto ...
Samson v. Western Capital Partners LLC (In re Blixseth)
Bankruptcy Court credits trustee’s expert’s cash flow analysis in finding “billionaire” debtor was insolvent at the time she signed a guarantee for a $13 million loan defendant made to her son; because the transfer was fraudulent, the court sets aside the ...
Bankruptcy Court Discredits DCF as ‘Easily Manipulated’
Bankruptcy court disapproves of DCF method as lending itself to manipulation, noting rivaling experts’ “strikingly” divergent valuations despite reliance on basically the same data and analysis.
U.S. Bank N.A. v. Verizon Communications Inc.
District court finds expert “forced” spun-off company’s low value by calculating a DCF value that “is low in the extreme and implied an incredibly low trading multiple for the [subject]”; the expert selected “the most pessimistic projections” of future pe ...