BVResearch Pro

Featured Content

Stay appraised of all the latest business considerations in the jewelry industry! The report explains how jewelry stores operate, the nature of their revenue streams, value drivers, the industry environment, the risks involved, and other key factors.

Learn More Download Briefing

Welcome to BVResearch Pro
BVResearch Pro is a complete knowledge library with a wealth of the best business valuation research, news, legal analysis, webinar transcripts, and BVR publications in one platform. The BVResearch Pro’s sophisticated search engine helps you find answers more easily than ever before. Stay current with access to 8,000+ articles (and counting), legal digests, and more from the world’s foremost thought-leaders in business valuation.  Learn more and subscribe >>
Search Tips Expand the following panels for additional search options.

Has the impact of inflation on UK business valuations officially ended?

The Bank of England established their target inflation rate of 2% to help businesses and consumers plan. However, Nick Forrest (UK Economics Leader for PwC) comments that inflation actually varies hugely from this target, even during non-inflationary periods, depending on which factor an analyst uses.

U.S. Appellate Court Rules Sufficient Evidence to Support Future Damages

In this partnership dispute, the 11th Circuit U.S. Appellate Court affirmed the district court and ruled that trial testimony of witnesses provided specific evidence that an energy utility company needed technicians the partnership provided before the disassociation and was not likely to change in the future. Damages were deemed “reasonably certain.” The defendants’ argument that, without an equitable accounting, the damages were too speculative, was waived because it was first raised post-verdict.

Fifth annual energy valuation conference in Houston

The 2015 Energy Valuation Conference will “provide relevant information and perspectives about current issues in the performance of energy-related valuations.”

Expert Excluded for Offering Legal and State of Mind Opinions in Delaware

“In plaintiffs' action against an energy company for aiding and abetting alleged breaches of fiduciary duty by the officers of a pipeline company, the court granted a motion in limine to exclude an expert's report under Del. R. Evid. 702(a) because it expressed a legal opinion on whether the fiduciaries' conduct was reasonable. [Also], [t]he expert report impermissibly expressed opinions about state of mind, which were factual determinations for the court to make. [Finally] [t]he expert offered impermissible opinions about whether the parties believed their agreement was breached, because he interpreted the agreement using extrinsic evidence.”

Major changes in energy sector valuations

In the wake of the pandemic, there is a “paradigm shift” in valuations in the energy sector, according to one speaker at the Energy Valuation Conference, hosted by the Houston Chapter of the American Society of Appraisers on May 12.

Advanced Class on Monte Carlo Simulations

Participants will learn next-level skills in Monte Carlo simulations, such as: constructing confidence intervals, two or more random variables that are correlated, and using non-Excel software platforms (i.e., Python, Octave). Participants will also learn some VBA coding for running Monte Carlo simulations. The webinar will also present multiple Monte Carlo simulation examples, such as: contingent consideration with correlated variables, dealing with future dilutive financing rounds in an option pricing model/equity allocation framework, and option pricing ...

Wright v. Irish (Hudson Valley Clean Energy, Inc.)

Court discredits respondent expert’s capitalization of earnings calculation and market-based analysis, noting “severe deficiencies” and instead adopts petitioner expert’s valuation but applies DLOM to entire equity value, not just goodwill.

Zimmerman v. Sabretooth Energy Ltd.

In Zimmerman v. Sabretooth Energy Ltd., 2007 ABQB 685 (November 13, 2007), the Alberta Court of Queen’s Bench determined whether a Chartered Business Appraiser (CBV) or an investment bank should be appointed to value stock of an oil and gas company for di ...

Court Denies Motion to Exclude Rebuttal Testimony of Damages

This case concerned the purchase of a historic steam plant in downtown St. Louis. The claims included breach of contract, fraudulent conveyance, and tortious interference, among others. This particular case dealt with a motion in limine to exclude rebuttal testimony from the expert for the counterclaim defendants regarding damages put forth by the counterclaim plaintiffs. The court denied the motion.

U.S. District Court (New York) Denies Motion to Exclude Expert Witness

The primary focus of this case was cross-motions for summary judgment on issues dealing with fiduciary duty and implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing. A final issue, of importance to valuation experts, was a motion to exclude the testimony of the plaintiff’s valuation expert, which the court denied.

Find the ASA BV presentations on BVLibrary.com

Find the ASA BV presentations on Shannon Pratt's Business Valuation Online Library ! You can read and download the complete Business Valuation presentations on the Business Valuation Online Lib ...

Fairness Opinion Triggers Viable Aiding and Abetting Claim Against Financial Advisor

In dispute over related-party transaction, court upholds aiding and abetting claim against financial advisor; plaintiffs produced enough facts to show fairness opinion ignored most relevant precedent transaction and other valuation metrics indicating the buyer was overpaying for contested asset.

Tax Court Valuation of Public Utility Gets Mixed Marks From State High Court

State Supreme Court says, in valuing public utility, Tax Court had discretion to adopt Commissioner expert’s position on company-specific risk premium and build-up method but failed to explain choice of specific beta factors; Supreme Court remands.

The District Court Refuses to Throw Out Experts Under Daubert Motions, Citing Differences in Admissibility and Scrutiny Under Cross-Examination

This case involves a consideration of motions by both the plaintiff and the defendant to exclude the testimony of the other party’s expert witness on the basis of Daubert and the Federal Rules of Evidence. The plaintiff’s expert offered testimony on how to calculate lost profits based on the plaintiff’s market share. The defendant’s expert offered testimony as to weaknesses in the plaintiff’s calculations and opinions on damages. The court denied both of these cross-motions.

Patent Infringement Suit Motion to Exclude Expert Witness

In this patent infringement and validity matter, the defendants have moved for exclusion of the plaintiffs’ technical expert, who was proffered to testify as to infringement and invalidity of five patents-in-suit. The court granted in part and denied in part the defendants’ motion, which included five assertions as to why the testimony should be excluded.

Debtors’ Balance Sheet Not Reliable Indicator of Assets’ Market Value

Court says debtors “appear to be hopelessly insolvent” and rejects shareholders’ call for equity committee; debtors’ prepetition published financials are not “dependable evidence” of assets’ fair market value, even if investors relied on balance sheets.

Appreciation in Liquor Company’s Value Represents Marital Property, Appeals Court Finds

Appeals court upholds ruling that appreciation in value of husband’s interest in family liquor business is marital asset; trial court carefully analyzed husband’s role in company to find he “substantially contributed” to the increase and husband stipulated to wife’s substantial contribution.

Court Allows Tesla Dissenting Shareholder Suit to Go Forward

Court of Chancery says Tesla dissenting shareholders allege sufficient facts to show company CEO, Elon Musk, was a controlling shareholder, despite holding a minority interest; court allows breach of fiduciary claims concerning acquisition of related company to proceed.

‘Dramatic’ Valuation Adjustment Justifies Equity Committee

In a rare nod to shareholder concerns, Bankruptcy Court approves formation of equity committee based on “dramatic adjustment in valuation” and inconsistent management positions as to financial health of debtors pre-Chapter 11 and post-petition filing.

Federal Circuit Sharpens EMVR Test Applicable to Multicomponent Products

Federal Circuit clarifies EMVR applicability in calculating reasonable royalty related to a multicomponent, infringing product that contains other valuable nonpatented features; court explains how the patent holder must show that the patented feature was the sole driver of consumer demand.

Court Endorses Unadjusted Deal Price as Fair Value Indicator Despite Flaws in Sale Process

In statutory appraisal action featuring publicly traded company, court relies on deal price for fair value; although flawed, sale process, when compared to process in three key high court decisions endorsing deal price, does not undermine validity of deal price; no adjustment for synergies.

Bankruptcy Court Decides on Debtor Qualification as a ‘Small Business’ Under Chapter 11

The Bankruptcy Court decided and ordered on the issue of whether the debtor qualified as a “small business debtor” under subchapter V of Chapter 11. The court decided that, as of the petition date, the debtor was engaged in commercial or business activity in both of its business activities. The debtor met her burden of proof as qualifying under Subchapter V of Chapter 11.

Bankruptcy Court Calls Choice of Comparables ‘Key Value Driver’ in Expert Valuations

Ruling on plan confirmation, Bankruptcy Court finds debtor expert’s determination of total enterprise value of reorganized debtor more credible than committee for unsecured creditors’ expert; in adopting debtor expert’s comparable company analysis, court calls choice of comparables set a “key value driver.”

Keeping Gross Alive, Nimble Tax Court Accepts PTE Tax Affecting

In gift tax dispute, Tax Court adopts estate expert’s valuation of two related PTEs, including expert’s tax affecting; court distinguishes Gross and later cases; issue is not whether to tax affect but how; estate expert’s tax affecting was “more accurate than [IRS’] blunt zero-rate approach.”

Appeals Court Upholds Tax Court’s Section 1031 Decision Pivoting on ‘Tainted Appraisals’

Appeals court upholds Tax Court’s ruling that taxpayer’s transactions do not represent section 1031 like-kind exchanges because taxpayer never assumed ownership of replacement plants; improper input from taxpayer’s law firm tainted appraisals used to show otherwise; accuracy penalty is justified.

126 - 150 of 1,033 results