Wisconsin Supreme Court Rules No Minority Discount in Fair Value Determination

Business Valuation UpdateVol. 6 No. 8
Legal and Court Case Update
August 2000

Access the Full Article

This article is available with a subscription to any of these products:
Already a subscriber?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (1,105 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
6324 Hospital and Medical Service Plans
524114 Direct Health and Medical Insurance Carriers
shareholder dissent/oppression
fair value, net asset value
HMO-W v. SSM Health Care System (II)
2000 WI 46, 234 Wis. 2d 707, 611 N.W. 2d 250, 2000 Wisc. LEXIS 313
June 7, 2000
US
State Court
Wisconsin
Supreme Court
James Pizzo (for HMO-W)<br>Patrick Hurst (for SSM)
Sauk

Summary

This is the decision of the Wisconsin Supreme Court from a Court of Appeals case that was reported in the July 1999 issue of Shannon Pratt's Business Valuation Update, p. 12.

See Also

HMO-W v. SSM Health Care System (II)

Full Text of Court Cases
June 7, 2000

At issue is whether the court of appeals erred when it precluded the application of minority discounts in determining the fair value of dissenters' shares.