Why Divorce Valuation Does Not Accord With Chapter 7 Liquidation Analysis

Business Valuation UpdateVol. 22 No. 6
Legal and Court Case Update
June 2016

Access the Full Article

This article is available with a subscription to any of these products:
Already a subscriber?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (1,885 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
8021 Offices and Clinics of Dentists
621210 Offices of Dentists
bankruptcy
enterprise goodwill, intrinsic value, liquidation, minority interest, professional practice, reorganization, standard of value, chapter 7 bankruptcy, creditor
In re Cole
2016 Bankr. LEXIS 932
March 24, 2016
US
Federal Court
Virginia
United States Bankruptcy Court
Robert Raymond (wife/creditor); Dean Heinberg, Bruce Matson (husband/debtor)
Phillips

Summary

Bankruptcy Court says differing standard of value in divorce and bankruptcy proceedings precludes use of divorce valuation of husband’s interest in dental practice; but valuation based on shareholder agreement accords with Chapter 7 liquidation analysis.

See Also

In re Cole

Full Text of Court Cases
March 24, 2016

Bankruptcy Court says differing standard of value in divorce and bankruptcy proceedings precludes use of divorce valuation of husband’s interest in dental practice; but valuation based on shareholder agreement accords with Chapter 7 liquidation analysis.