Summary
A divided Superior Court of Pennsylvania ruled, on first impression, that vested stock options should be considered as income available for child support on the date they vest.
See Also
Donna K. MacKinley v. Gerald L. Messerschmidt
A divided Superior Court of Pennsylvania ruled, on first impression, that vested stock options should be considered as income available for child support on the date they vest. It stated, “We hold that once vested, stock options become accessible to a par ...