Valuation based on future "option to purchase" price rejected by trial court

Business Valuation UpdateVol. 8 No. 12
Legal and Court Case Update
December 2002

Access the Full Article

This article is available with a subscription to any of these products:
Already a subscriber?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (509 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
5031 Lumber, Plywood, Millwork, and Wood Panels
423310 Lumber, Plywood, Millwork, and Wood Panel Merchant Wholesalers
marital dissolution/divorce
marital dissolution
Willman v. Cole
2002 Ohio 3596, 2002 Ohio App. LEXIS 3692
July 9, 2002
US
State Court
Ohio
Court of Appeals
Steve Santen (for husband)
Abele

Summary

The issue in this marital dissolution matter was whether the husband had realized any "added value" when he exercised stock options in Cedar Works, Inc. Facts Under the terms of th ...

See Also

Willman v. Cole

Full Text of Court Cases
July 9, 2002

The issue in this marital dissolution matter was whether the husband had realized any "added value" when he exercised stock options in Cedar Works, Inc.