Unlike Marriages, Stipulations on Valuation Issues Are Hard to Undo

Business Valuation UpdateVol. 12 No. 6
Legal and Court Case Update
June 2006

Access the Full Article

This article is available with a subscription to any of these products:
Already a subscriber?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (737 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
8721 Accounting, Auditing, and Bookkeeping Services
marital dissolution/divorce
In re the Marriage of Harrod
2005 Cal. App. Unpub. LEXIS 9420
October 18, 2005
US
State Court
California
Court of Appeals
Jerald Udinsky (wife); Cynthia Davis (husband)
Bamattre-Manoukian

Summary

Court upholds stipulation of valuation date (and valuation which adheres to it) when both parties had legal representation and reasonable access to all relevant facts.

See Also

In re the Marriage of Harrod

Full Text of Court Cases
October 18, 2005

The California Court of Appeals for the Sixth District considered several issues involving the valuation of a closely held real estate developer.