Treatment of Shareholder Loans and Future Tax Consequences Considered

Business Valuation Update BVLaw
Legal and Court Case Update
April 15, 2005

Access the Full Article

This article is available with a subscription to any of these products:
Already a subscriber?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (632 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
marital dissolution/divorce
James M. Rosenberger v. Hollis Rosenberger
2005 Ohio 1790
US
State Court
Ohio
Court of Appeals
Jonathan A. Rich, Margaret E. Stanard
Loree Weiss Connors, CPA; Robert Greenwald
Nader

Summary

The Ohio Court of Appeals, 11th District, reversed the lower court’s distributive award because the trial court treated the shareholder loans as debts of the parties’ business, but did not correspondingly treat the loans as personal assets of parties.

See Also

James M. Rosenberger v. Hollis Rosenberger

Full Text of Court Cases
April 15, 2005

The Ohio Court of Appeals, Eleventh District reversed the lower court’s distributive award because the trial court treated the shareholder loans as debts of the parties’ business, but did not correspondingly treat the loans as personal assets of parties.