Time Rule Applied to Determine the Marital Portion of a Personal Injury Settlement

Business Valuation Update BVLaw
Legal and Court Case Update
March 20, 1998

Access the Full Article

This article is available with a subscription to any of these products:
Already a subscriber?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (332 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
marital dissolution/divorce
Monty Riley Criss v. Atsuko Kunisada
No. 20020 (HI App. 1998), unpublished
US
State Court
Hawaii
Court of Appeals
Acoba

Summary

The Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals affirmed the lower court's use of a coverture fraction (the time rule) to determined the marital portion of husband's personal injury settlement.

See Also

Monty Riley Criss v. Atsuko Kunisada

Full Text of Court Cases
March 20, 1998

The Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals affirmed the lower court's use of a coverture fraction (the time rule) to determined the marital portion of husband's personal injury settlement. In this instance, the numerator was the number of years the parties ...