Synergies Lie at Core of Cable TV Systems Sale

Business Valuation UpdateVol. 17 No. 9
Legal and Court Case Update
September 2011

Access the Full Article

This article is available with a subscription to any of these products:
Already a subscriber?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (927 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
shareholder dissent/oppression
In re Cencom Cable Income Partners, LP
2011 WL 2178825
June 3, 2011
US
State Court
Delaware
Court of Chancery
Mark Thaw (plaintiffs); and Melvin Fineberg, Daniels & Associates, and Kane (defendants)
Noble

Summary

Delaware Chancery Court finds price and process for sale of cable TV systems was fair, despite contemporaneous valuation that appraised the systems individually rather than on aggregate, and did not expressly include or quantify synergies.

See Also

In re Cencom Cable Income Partners, LP

Full Text of Court Cases
June 3, 2011

DE Chancery Court finds price and process for sale of cable TV systems was fair, despite contemporaneous valuation that appraised the systems individually rather than on aggregate, and did not expressly include or quantify synergies.