Six Valuation Experts Try to Show Barclays Reaped a Windfall in Lehman Sale

Business Valuation UpdateVol. 17 No. 6
Legal and Court Case Update
June 2011
bankruptcy

In re Lehman Bros. Holdings Inc.
2011 WL 597970 (Bankrtcy. S.D.N.Y.)
February 22, 2011
US
Federal Court
Federal
United States Bankruptcy Court
Professor Paul Pfleiderer (Barclays); Joseph Schwaba, Mark Zmijewski, John Garvey, John Schneider, Mark Slattery, and John Olvany (Lehman Bros.)
Peck

Summary

Bankruptcy court denies Lehman Brother’s motion to reconsider billion-dollar distressed sale of brokerage assets during financial meltdown of September 2008, based in part on expert evidence that showed Barclays did not receive a $13 billion “windfall.”

See Also

In re Lehman Bros. Holdings Inc.

Bankruptcy court denies Lehman Brother’s motion to reconsider billion-dollar distressed sale of brokerage assets during financial meltdown of September 2008, based in part on expert evidence that showed Barclays did not receive a $13 billion “windfall.”